Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

535 Petitions

Docket No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

Kimble-Davis v. Office of Personnel Management

Question(s) Presented

“The Questions Presented are:” 1. “Whether an agency/court can determine an individual is not a designated beneficiary without providing the claimed beneficiary with the appropriate documentation?” 2. “Whether [the Office of Personnel...

Saha Thai Steel Pipe PCL v. Wheatland Tube Co.

Question(s) Presented

“Under 19 U.S.C. [§] 1673, Congress directed two agencies, the Department of Commerce (‘Commerce’) and the International Trade Commission (the ‘Commission’ or ‘ITC’), to make two distinct determinations before imposing...

Doyle v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Question(s) Presented

Frederick v. McDonough

Question(s) Presented

1. “The SHA medical exam is required at discharge by the [Department of Defense and the Department of] Veterans Affairs. When a serviceman is overlooked, would this be a Grave...

Arbor Global Strategies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Question(s) Presented

“The same panel of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that makes the decision to institute inter partes review of a patent’s validity goes on to conduct the inter partes...

Lighting Defense Group v. SnapRays

Question(s) Presented

“In Calder v. Jones, this Court held that California courts could exercise personal jurisdiction over Florida defendants ‘because of their intentional conduct in Florida calculated to cause injury to [plaintiff]...

ParkerVision, Inc. v. TCL Industries Holdings Co.

Rule 3610 Amici

Question(s) Presented

“Section 144 of the Patent Act directs the Federal Circuit to decide appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) by issuing ‘opinion[s].’ 35 U.S.C. § 144. The word...

Reed v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Question(s) Presented

1. “Under the Whistleblower Protection Act, does an HR specialist who, after reporting her coworker and first level supervisor for harassment, engage in protected activity, sufficient to merit protection from...

Herbert v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Federal Circuit’s affirmance of the district court’s grant of summary judgment without an opinion under Rule 36 is permissible, when the decision conflicts with the Federal Circuit’s...

Anoruo v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Question(s) Presented

“The Fifth Amendment government immunity does not confer a privilege to lie. See United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U. S. 115,117 (1980). Due process is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution...

Return Mail, Inc. v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“Return Mail has a patent for processing undeliverable mail. This Court is familiar with it, since that patent was at issue in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service,...

Island Intellectual Property LLC v. TD Ameritrade, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“This case represents a dangerous trend in patent cases whereby district courts grant summary judgment while ignoring factual disputes and/or weighing evidentiary disputes against non-movants, thus depriving parties of their...

Frantzis v. McDonough

Veterans2 Amici

Question(s) Presented

“‘The fundamental requirement of due process is the opportunity to be heard “at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.”’ Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976). Therefore,...

Miller Mendel, Inc. v. City of Anna

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Federal Circuit in removing a duly appointed Article III judge from judicial duties for her refusal to submit to a mental health evaluation usurped the exclusive constitutional...

Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd.

Question(s) Presented

“This case presents an exceptionally important question regarding the proper scope of the Hatch-Waxman Act’s regulatory safe harbor.” “Under the Act, Congress declared that ‘[i]t shall not be an act of...

Plotagraph, Inc. v. Lightricks, Ltd.

Question(s) Presented

“Inventors Troy Plota, Sascha Connelly and Plotagraph, Inc (Plotagraph) own and practice five patents that disclose applications allowing users to create the illusion of movement within a digital photograph or...

Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Question(s) Presented

“Congress created the Hatch-Waxman Act with the purpose of hastening the introduction of less-costly generic drugs while safeguarding the legitimate patent rights of innovator companies. The lower court’s interpretation of...

Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. v. Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“This petition concerns core appellate procedure. In reviewing bench trials, the courts of appeals must ‘discuss’ and ‘analyze’ the district court’s findings, not make factual findings on their own. Icicle...

W.J. v. Becerra

Question(s) Presented

“28 U.S.C. § 2501, which is explicitly jurisdictional in that it applies to ‘[e]very claim of which the United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction,’ provides that ‘[a] petition...

Campbell v. Tube-Mac Industries, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “As Congress has signed the United States of America to the rules and stipulations of the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty and the Federal Circuit through Voda v. Cordis, 476...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11