FedCircuitBlog

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• an article commenting on how a recent “verdict serves as a reminder of a fundamental reality in patent litigation: When a patented feature — even one representing only a small portion of the overall product — is incorporated into hundreds of millions or billions of units, it can create enormous financial exposure”; and
• an article highlighting how this week “the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order list that included a denial of Google’s petition for writ of certiorari challenging the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s . . . development of the ‘settled expectations’ doctrine at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.”

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• an article reporting how the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday “refused to take up a case in which Google argued that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has exceeded its authority by using the age of patents as a reason to refuse to review them”;
• a blog post highlighting how “eligibility is again about a fifth of the PTAB’s appeal docket . . . and the Board has nearly stopped raising Section 101 ‘new grounds of rejection’”;
• a blog post announcing how the publication of “Unfettered Invention: How the X Patents Sparked Early American Technology”; and
• an article noting how a recent motion in a patent case argued a “presentation of legal opinions” by retired judge Kathleen O’Malley of the Federal Circuit “was inappropriate.”

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• an article reporting how the Federal Circuit “heard oral arguments in the Weymouth Kirkland Courtroom of the University of Chicago Law School” last week, “giving students, faculty, and other members of the community a chance to see the court in action”;
• an article highlighting how, “[f]ollowing the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of Judge Pauline Newman’s petition for certiorari in June, the Chief Justice of the United States has transferred Newman’s judicial misconduct case to the Eleventh Circuit Judicial Council”;
• an article commenting on how “Chief Justice John Roberts has handed 99-year-old U.S. Circuit Judge Pauline Newman a lifeline in her yearslong fight against a suspension imposed by her colleagues, transferring the judicial disability dispute to a federal appeals court”; and
• an article noting how “[i]t took over three years, but the judicial conduct complaint against Judge Pauline Newman has finally left the building.”

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• an article noting how, “out of the nation’s 13 federal appeals courts, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is a remarkable outlier, having sent just one of its former clerks on to the chambers of a Supreme Court justice”;
• an article discussing discussing how this week the Supreme Court “considered whether federal district courts have the authority to hear certain constitutional challenges to laws affecting veterans’ benefits and, if they do, what types of constitutional challenges fall into this category”; and
• an article reporting how, after “Judge Clevenger, 89, retired Friday after 36 years on the bench,” “[h]is former clerks and fellow judges all zeroed in on his intelligence, level of preparation for each case and discerning eye, which they say will be missed at the court.”

An Eleventh Circuit order issued today granted Judge Newman’s request to make prior orders in her judicial misconduct case public. Notably, today’s order states that on August 19, 2026, Chief Judge Roberts transferred her case from the Federal Circuit to the Eleventh Circuit. Among the many interesting aspects of this decision by Chief Judge Roberts, it comes on the heals of the Supreme Court’s decision on June 15, 2026, to deny review of a D.C. Circuit judgment rejecting Judge Newman’s challenge to the Federal Circuit’s handling of her case. For more information on today’s development, here are reports by several news agencies. We will report more as more information becomes available.

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• an article how the Federal Circuit recently “denied [a] bid for a full court review of a panel decision that reinstated a $177 million jury verdict” for patent infringement, “while one dissenting judge said the panel’s holding ‘creates confusion’ over enablement standards for patent method claims”;
• a blog post reporting how Crocs has asked the Supreme Court to decide “whether an agency disposition is final as to some issues, thus triggering deadlines for judicial review, while other issues decided in the same disposition remain subject to further executive or administrative review”;
• an article discussing how the Federal Circuit recently “issued a precedential decision affirming a finding of invalidity of certain claims [a] wireless communications patent, but holding that the district court’s reasoning, which focused on indefiniteness, was erroneous”; and
• an article highlighting how a “Wisconsin congressman unveiled a bill Wednesday aimed at modernizing the law governing misconduct investigations for federal judges and limit indefinite suspensions of jurists which judicial advocates say amount to ‘stealth impeachments.’”

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• an article discussing how the Federal Circuit recently issued an opinion “affirming a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California that granted Google LLC and YouTube LLC judgment on the pleadings on patent ineligibility grounds”;
• an article reporting how the Federal Circuit recently held that the “Patent Trial and Appeal Board was right to fully invalidate a speech recognition patent that Apple stands accused of infringing”;
• an article noting how the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal because “the 30-day deadline of 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a) for filing a notice of appeal is ‘mandatory and jurisdictional’ with no equitable exceptions”; and
• an article highlighting how the Federal Circuit recently “reversed the Merit Systems Protection Board’s dismissal” of a Presidential Innovation Fellow’s “whistleblower appeal . . . , finding he had made sufficient allegations of gross mismanagement to establish jurisdiction.”

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• an article explaining how the Federal Circuit held that claims in three patents covering profitability-calculation methods are ineligible;
• an article reporting how USPTO Director John Squires asked the Federal Circuit to remand tech companies’ appeal of a $253 million patent judgment back to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; and
• an article highlighting how Senators Ashley Moody and Chris Coons introduced a bill, the Better Bench Act, that would let judges on the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims live anywhere in the United States instead of within 50 miles of Washington, D.C.

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• an article how an inventor “is asking the Supreme Court to take up his case, not to overturn Alice, but to clarify how courts should apply it”;
• an article noting how “Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was among a group of nearly 50 economists” telling the Federal Circuit “that President Donald Trump improperly used a ‘balance-of-payments’ provision to justify a round of global tariffs earlier this year”;
• an article reporting the Merit Systems Protection Board “has finalized rules ending standards it has used since the early 1980s to weigh the appropriateness of a penalty—often firing—in appeals by federal employees of disciplinary actions for alleged misconduct”; and
• an article describing how “[c]ourts are testing the boundaries of” Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo “on federal regulatory authority,” saying it “left open a path for judges to defer to executive branch agencies in certain circumstances.”

Here is a report on recent news and commentary related to the Federal Circuit and its cases. Today we highlight:

• a report highlighting that the Federal Circuit “is writing more opinions . . . several years after it faced criticism from a group of patent lawyers and academics”;
• an article noting how the Federal Circuit “handed SpaceTime3D, Inc. mixed results in two nonprecedential decisions involving graphical user interface patents challenged by Apple and Google”; and
• a piece explaining how “two dozen states pushed the Federal Circuit . . . to revive their specific claims against now-expired temporary tariffs while simultaneously pushing the panel to otherwise back the U.S. Court of International Trade’s ruling that the tariffs were illegal.”