Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

494 Petitions

Appeal No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

Question(s) Presented

Whether “[r]ehearing is required because the Motions Panel has issued an order based on a completely fabricated factual premise that directly contradicts the unalterable electronic text of the underlying record.”

In re Medical Components, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a mandamus should issue when the district court fails to follow a mandate which: (i) was issued by this Court in this proceeding; and (2), required the district court...

Caddo Systems, Inc. v. Jetbrains Americas, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “What distinguishes a claim directed to a specific manner of displaying or navigating information in a computer interface, held patent eligible in Core Wireless, Data Engine, and Trading Technologies...

Epic Tech, LLC v. Pen-Tech Associates, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Can it be a sanctionable act for a patentee to rely on the statutory presumption of validity?” 2. “Whether a patentee can be forced to prove its patent is valid...

25-1263, 25-1264, 25-1265

DoDots Licensing Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Should this Court address the procedural unfairness at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board—the reason obviousness, rather than anticipation, accounts for almost 90% of the grounds on which the...

Exelixis, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private Ltd.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Does Ariad permit claiming an unpredictable genus (e.g., a genus of all polymorphs for a chemical compound) when it is undisputed that, as of the priority date, a POSA...

TexasLDPC Inc. v. Broadcom Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Is retention of constitutional standing to assert a patent a ‘substantial right’ under the analysis used by this Court to determine whether a patent owner has effectively assigned a...

Biofer S.P.A. v. Vifor (International) AG

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether the “panel opinion’s sua sponte forfeiture holding (a) conflicts with this Court’s settled standards that unchanged proposed claim-constructions are preserved regardless of supporting arguments; and (b) erroneously held...

24-1600, 24-1601, 24-1602, 24-1603, 24-1604, 24-1605

Hafeman v. Google LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether “[t]he panel’s precedential decision warrants rehearing because its treatment of the disputed limitation is difficult to reconcile with Phillips v. AWH Corp. . . . and this Court’s...

Clearplay, Inc. v. DISH Network L.L.C.

Question(s) Presented

“[W]hether the Federal Circuit’s requirement of ‘particularized testimony and linking argument,’ as applied to set aside a jury’s equivalence verdict resting on panel-credited limitation-specific testimony and on Warner-Jenkinson enumerated factors,...

EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google LLC

Question(s) Presented

Did the court err in “failing to rigorously scrutinize a patentee’s reliance on supposedly comparable licenses” resulting in an “artificially inflated damages award that is divorced from market realities and...

LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether the rigid approach to evaluating the obviousness of designs under In re Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 391 (CCPA 1982) and Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., Inc., 101 F.3d 100...

Bedgear, LLC v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.

Question(s) Presented

Bedgear, LLC asserts that “[e]n banc review is necessary to secure and maintain uniformity in the Court’s decisions in all pending cases that raise the same important constitutional question whether...

In re Core Scientific, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether a party is precluded from addressing in its reply an issue raised by the Court and raised in the opposing response brief for the first time on appeal...

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a district court’s refusal to grant a pro se litigant CM/ECF access, while mandating a secondary, delayed ‘ADS’ or paper-filing system, creates a ‘Procedural Asymmetry’ that violates the principle...

In re Comcast Cable Communications, LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a defendant’s alleged performance of a single step of a claimed multi-step method in a judicial district is sufficient to establish that ‘the defendant has committed acts of infringement’...

In re Catanzaro

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether rehearing en banc is warranted where, after the panel’s denial of mandamus, the district court issued an order (Doc. 139) before the mandate had issued, relying on a...

Applications In Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether a plaintiff holding a recorded patent assignment, who reasonably believed it owned the asserted patents at the time the complaint was filed, lacks Article III constitutional standing or...

25-1470, 25-1472

Spero v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. “Under 35 U.S.C. § 316(e), the petitioner bears the burden of proving unpatentability by a preponderance of the evidence. Does the Board violate this statute by failing to address...

Woodway USA, Inc. v. Lifecore Fitness, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

Whether “the full panel of this Court should address this appeal en banc to maintain a consistent application of its precedent with respect to file history disclaimer and to protect...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8