Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
En Banc Petitions
Search By
Status
Any
Pending
Moot
Granted
Denied
Withdrawn
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
294 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
21-1838
Case
Modern Font Applications LLC v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a panel of this Court may hold that this Court lacks jurisdiction over matters within the ‘collateral order doctrine’ in direct conflict with the Richardson-Merrell and DePuy Synthes opinions...
Appeal No.
18-2170
Case
Bedgear, LLC v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Moot
Question(s) Presented
Bedgear, LLC asserts that “[e]n banc review is necessary to secure and maintain uniformity in the Court’s decisions in all pending cases that raise the same important constitutional question whether...
Appeal No.
23-103
Case
In re Nimitz Technologies LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the district court may require that a litigant provide attorney-client privileged documents to the judge that is investigating the party, where the crime fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege...
Appeal No.
22-1624
Case
Jump Rope Systems, LLC v. Coulter Ventures, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the collateral estoppel doctrine applies to a patent infringement action in federal district court when the plaintiff in that case previously lost on appeal before this Court on review...
Appeal No.
22-153
Case
In re Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Subject
Patent
2 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the legal inquiry for venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) turns on whether the employer’s actions have created a ‘regular and established place of business’ in the district, not...
Appeal No.
22-140, 22-141, 22-142
Case
In re Google LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the Panel incorrectly applied the ‘center of gravity’ factor rather than the binding Fifth Circuit private and public factors under In re Volkswagen AG, 371 F.3d 201, 203 (5th...
Appeal No.
22-137
Case
In re Apple Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “this Court overlooked, or did not have the benefit of at the time of its ruling, the following points of law and fact: Apple’s venue witness, Mark Rollins, was found...
Appeal No.
22-128
Case
In re Apple Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the Panel erred when it misapplied controlling Fifth Circuit law, opting rather to issue mandamus relief based upon mere ‘errors of judgment’ by the district court in applying the...
Appeal No.
22-1216, 22-1217, 22-1218
Case
Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(A)(4) to hear a direct appeal from a final agency action by the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial...
Appeal No.
22-1196
Case
Golden v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
22-1145
Case
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. P3 International Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a party seeking an exceptional case determination can be faulted for seeking an award of its attorney fees early in and throughout the case, and that conduct weighed against...
Appeal No.
22-1027, 22-1028
Case
CareDx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Amicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether an improvement on a human-made method is patent eligible at Alice step one, when the claimed advance is also human-made?” “Whether an improvement upon a human-made method is patent eligible...
Appeal No.
22-1016
Case
Click-to-Call Technologies, LP v. Ingenio, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)’s IPR estoppel provision applies only to claims addressed in the final written decision, as consistent with the holdings in Shaw, and Intuitive Surgical, and whether...
Appeal No.
21-2369
Case
Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Does the Erie doctrine require this Court to apply state substantive law when deciding an issue of contract interpretation under state law, including a state contract law principle that there...
Appeal No.
21-2137
Case
Low Temp Industries, Inc. v. Duke Manufacturing Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a district court’s grant of preliminary injunction can be properly reversed under an abuse of discretion standard because the claims appear ‘vulnerable’ to a validity challenge even though the...
Appeal No.
21-2121
Case
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether the “panel in this case [correctly] concluded that a prior-art reference could not anticipate or disclose an invention formed from two elements contained in defined lists that the art...
Appeal No.
21-2111
Case
Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether it is proper to treat a system built in 2019 for purposes of the litigation that included certain prior art components (i.e., the 2019 HAL System) as an...
Appeal No.
21-2093
Case
Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a District Court’s construction of a claim term in an asserted patent, determined to be consistent with a totality of the evidence based on analysis of conflicting definitions provided...
Appeal No.
21-2040
Case
VDPP LLC v. VIZIO, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “The en banc portion of Williamson held, in part, that ‘[w]hen a claim term lacks the word “means,” the presumption’ against means-plus-function treatment ‘can be overcome and § 112, para....
Appeal No.
21-1963, 21-1987
Case
Evolusion Concepts, Inc. v. Hoc Events, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“When a patentee says that ‘the invention is’ something—a phrase that appears in countless patents—is the interested public entitled to rely on that statement when determining the scope of the...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8