Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

En Banc Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
309 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
23-1362
Case
Vroom, Inc. v. Sidekick Technology, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a district court’s judgment on the pleadings in favor of the plaintiffs that all of the defendant’s asserted patent claims are invalid is sufficiently final for this Court to...
Appeal No.
22-1253
Case
LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the rigid approach to evaluating the obviousness of designs under In re Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 391 (CCPA 1982) and Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., Inc., 101 F.3d 100...
Appeal No.
21-2348
Case
LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the rigid approach to evaluating the obviousness of designs under In re Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 391 (CCPA 1982) and Durling v. Spectrum Furniture Co., Inc., 101 F.3d 100...
Appeal No.
21-2320, 21-2376
Case
Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Court should expand what has been an extremely limited exception to the well-established general rule of claim construction, that indefinite articles ‘a’ or ‘an’ mean ‘one or...
Appeal No.
21-2296, 21-2297, 22-1070
Case
Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether this Court may presume a district court considered and rejected issues and evidence presented, where the district court failed to address them and failed to provide sufficient detail...
Appeal No.
18-1049
Case
Cioffi v. Google LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “What is the proper construction of Section 251’s requirement that, upon certain conditions being met, the Patent Office shall ‘reissue the patent for the invention disclosed in the original...
Appeal No.
18-2170
Case
Bedgear, LLC v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Moot
Question(s) Presented
Bedgear, LLC asserts that “[e]n banc review is necessary to secure and maintain uniformity in the Court’s decisions in all pending cases that raise the same important constitutional question whether...
Appeal No.
23-1146
Case
Lite-Netics, LLC v. Nu Tsai Capital LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the panel erred, as a factual matter, by expressing in a precedential opinion that Appellee did not argue for preservation of a preliminary injunction in part, if the panel...
Appeal No.
23-103
Case
In re Nimitz Technologies LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the district court may require that a litigant provide attorney-client privileged documents to the judge that is investigating the party, where the crime fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege...
Appeal No.
22-1878
Case
Astellas US LLC v. Hospira, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a district court abuses its discretion when it permits an ANDA filer to change its product mid-litigation, for the very purpose of attempting to design around the patent-holder’s theory...
Appeal No.
22-1624
Case
Jump Rope Systems, LLC v. Coulter Ventures, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the collateral estoppel doctrine applies to a patent infringement action in federal district court when the plaintiff in that case previously lost on appeal before this Court on review...
Appeal No.
22-153
Case
In re Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the legal inquiry for venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) turns on whether the employer’s actions have created a ‘regular and established place of business’ in the district, not...
Appeal No.
22-140, 22-141, 22-142
Case
In re Google LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the Panel incorrectly applied the ‘center of gravity’ factor rather than the binding Fifth Circuit private and public factors under In re Volkswagen AG, 371 F.3d 201, 203 (5th...
Appeal No.
22-137
Case
In re Apple Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “this Court overlooked, or did not have the benefit of at the time of its ruling, the following points of law and fact: Apple’s venue witness, Mark Rollins, was found...
Appeal No.
22-128
Case
In re Apple Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the Panel erred when it misapplied controlling Fifth Circuit law, opting rather to issue mandamus relief based upon mere ‘errors of judgment’ by the district court in applying the...
Appeal No.
22-1216, 22-1217, 22-1218
Case
Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “this Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(A)(4) to hear a direct appeal from a final agency action by the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial...
Appeal No.
22-1196
Case
Golden v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
22-1193
Case
IPA Technologies Inc., v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “[t]he panel decision affirming the district court’s determination that claim language stating a request must be ‘formed according to’ (or ‘in’ or ‘adhering to’) a language imposes: (1) the...
Appeal No.
22-1145
Case
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. P3 International Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a party seeking an exceptional case determination can be faulted for seeking an award of its attorney fees early in and throughout the case, and that conduct weighed against...
Appeal No.
22-1136, 22-1186
Case
C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Medical Components, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “Bard’s asserted claims were eligible after the district court assumed Bard’s proposed construction for purposes of summary judgment under § 101.”