Search
Search | Sitemap Contact

En Banc Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
98 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
20-1155
Case
Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
The government presents the following questions: 1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which...
Appeal No.
20-1154
Case
Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which all parties have petitioned for...
Appeal No.
19-2430
Case
Document Security Systems, Inc v. Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which all parties have petitioned for...
Appeal No.
19-2339, 19-2231
Case
Vaporstream, Inc. v. Snap Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Snap Inc. presents the following questions: 1. “Whether the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges to the PTAB violates the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Art. 2, § 2, cl. 2,...
Appeal No.
19-2281
Case
Document Security Systems, Inc v. Seoul Semiconductor Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. "This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which all parties have petitioned for...
Appeal No.
19-2243
Case
Agrofresh, Inc. v. UPL Limited
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which all parties have petitioned for...
Appeal No.
19-2076
Case
HIP, Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether claims directed to an industrial-scale commercial process for manufacturing products (here food products) of a quality ‘resembling’ a traditional, handmade product are indefinite, and thus invalid, when the...
Appeal No.
19-2057
Case
Vilox Technologies, LLC v. Unified Patents Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex . . . in which all parties have petitioned for en banc review: A. Whether the administrative patent judges of...
Appeal No.
19-2026
Case
Mirror Imaging, LLC v. Fidelity Information Services
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex . . . in which all parties have petitioned for en banc review: A. Whether the administrative patent judges of...
Appeal No.
19-2011
Case
Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Incyte Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
The government presents the following questions: 1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which...
Appeal No.
19-1994
Case
Stuart v. Rust-Oleum Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Rust-Oleum's Questions Presented: 1. “Whether this Court erred by vacating and remanding this case based on an Appointments Clause challenge[] raised for the first time in a single pre-briefing motion before...
Appeal No.
19-1871
Case
Pfizer Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Director Iancu's Questions Presented: 1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex . . . in which all parties have petitioned for en banc review: A. Whether the administrative...
Appeal No.
19-1794, 19-1223
Case
SAP America, Inc. v. Arunachalam
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
19-1467, 19-1468
Case
Alacritech, Inc. v. Intel Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"[W]hether the Arthrex panel erred in severing the removal provisions necessary to sustain PTAB judges’ independent and impartiality, instead of striking down the entire statute."
Appeal No.
19-1464
Case
Alacritech, Inc. v. Intel Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"[W]hether the Arthrex panel erred in severing the removal provisions necessary to sustain PTAB judges’ independent and impartiality, instead of striking down the entire statute."
Appeal No.
19-1444
Case
Alacritech, Inc. v. Intel Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"[W]hether the Arthrex panel erred in severing the removal provisions necessary to sustain PTAB judges’ independent and impartiality, instead of striking down the entire statute."
Appeal No.
19-1264
Case
Cheetah Omni LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does the Supreme Court’s decision in Rodriguez v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. require this Court to abrogate its federal common law rule that, regardless of state contract law, continuation...
Appeal No.
19-126
Case
In re Google LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"[W]hether 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) 'requires the regular, physical presence of an employee or other agent of the defendant conducting the defendant’s business at the alleged 'place of business.'"
Appeal No.
19-1212, 19-1456
Case
Mira Advanced Technology v. Microsoft Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"This case has only one single issue, namely, whether the key claim term 'contact list' is properly construed by the Board."
Appeal No.
19-1202
Case
Polaris Innovations Limited v. Kingston Technology Company
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Polaris Innovations Limited presents the following questions: 1. “Whether severance of the tenure protections for Administrative Patent Judges (‘APJs’) was not available to the Arthrex panel to remedy the violation of...