Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

149 Petitions

Appeal No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

In re Arunachalam

Question(s) Presented

“Whether it is Sedition that Chief Justice Roberts engaged in conflict of interest against inventors as a member of the Knights of Malta with fealty to the Queen of England...

In re Apple Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “[W]hether a district court’s mere application of each § 1404(a) factor precludes mandamus even in the face of multiple clear legal errors in the analysis.” 2. “[W]hether a petitioner is...

Immunex Corp. v. Sandoz Inc.

Question(s) Presented

Whether “[a] party that obtains an exclusive license conveying ‘all substantial rights’ to a patent” may “nonetheless avoid becoming an effective owner under the all-substantial-rights test, and thereby evade double-patenting...

In re PersonalWeb Technologies LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether the court erred in ruling “that the Kessler doctrine precluded claims of infringement arising after this dismissal with prejudice—which involved no finding whatsoever of noninfringement.” 2. Whether “[t]he Panel’s...

LiquidPower Specialty Products v. Baker Hughes

Question(s) Presented

“Whether objective evidence of nonobviousness may be considered when deciding key obviousness questions such as whether a skilled artisan would have motivation to combine prior art references with a reasonable...

Ford Global Technologies, LLC v. New World International, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether under the doctrine of repair as applied to design patents the article of manufacture undergoing the repair or reconstruction analysis is determined by a claiming test that demonstrably does...

18-2198, -2303, -2305, -2306, -2317

Verinata Health, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether it is a sufficient basis for denying a permanent injunction that the infringer directly competes with third parties that license completely different patents from the patentholder.” 2. “Whether the...

Ericsson Inc. v. TCL Communication Technology

Question(s) Presented

“Whether, in determining whether a claim is directed to patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §101, the claim must be ‘considered in light of the specification,’ as held in Enfish,...

18-1400, 18-1401, 18-1402, 18-1403, 18-1537, 18-1540, 18-1541

Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the panel lacked jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) to determine whether the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (‘PTO’) properly instituted and ordered joinder of an inter partes...

Bedgear, LLC v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.

Question(s) Presented

Bedgear, LLC asserts that “[e]n banc review is necessary to secure and maintain uniformity in the Court’s decisions in all pending cases that raise the same important constitutional question whether...

Arunachalam v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Question(s) Presented

20-1394, -1396, -1397, -1398

Apple Inc. v. Universal Secure Registry LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether this Court has jurisdiction to review a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to terminate—contrary to statute—an instituted Covered Business Method or other post-grant review proceeding twelve...

Biogen International GmbH v. Banner Life Sciences LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the panel’s decision allows an infringer to avoid an innovator’s patent term extension by using the claimed and bioequivalent active moiety of the compound in the patentee’s approved...

North Star Innovations, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

Whether “[r]efusing to hold North Star to its forfeiture” by not making an Appointments Clause challenge to the Board “is contrary to the precedent of the Supreme Court and this...

North Star Innovations, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

Whether “[r]efusing to hold North Star to its forfeiture” by not making an Appointments Clause challenge to the Board “is contrary to the precedent of the Supreme Court and this...

North Star Innovations, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

Whether “[r]efusing to hold North Star to its forfeiture” by not making an Appointments Clause challenge to the Board “is contrary to the precedent of the Supreme Court and this...

Huang v. Mediatek USA, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Court failed to take into account the fact that Mr. Huang’s infringement contention clearly stated WHERE and HOW Nephos Inc. (MediaTeK USA) infringed the claims of the...

Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Hulu, LLC

Question(s) Presented

The government presents the following questions: 1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which...

Sound View Innovations, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), in which all parties have petitioned for...

In re Apple Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. Whether “the panel decision in this appeal conflicts with the Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. U.S. District Court, 571 U.S. 49 (2013), and this Court’s...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8