Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

En Banc Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
213 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
20-2309
Case
Mankaruse v. Raytheon Co.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
20-2297
Case
Mankaruse v. Intel Co.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
20-1993
Case
FG SRC, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the panel decision allowing Petitioner to replace its primary asserted reference with what the Board found to be ‘a different document’ submitted in Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response...
Appeal No.
20-1785
Case
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court and precedents of this Court: Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Integrated Network Corp., 972 F.2d...
Appeal No.
20-1601, 20-1602
Case
Sling TV, LLC v. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Board may terminate an instituted IPR proceeding on the eve of a merits-based final written decision to reassess institution when 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) instruction that a decision...
Appeal No.
20-1561, 20-1642
Case
Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc.
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Whether the panel decision “is contrary to the . . . decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States [in] . . . MedImmune Inc. v. Genetech, Inc., 549...
Appeal No.
20-1074
Case
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, Aventisub LLC
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the panel’s new enablement test for genus claims with functional limitations, which has no basis in § 112’s text, conflicts with Supreme Court decisions, including Minerals Separation, Ltd. v....
Appeal No.
20-1041
Case
Wi-LAN Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“May a district court properly disregard an expert’s opinion on summary judgment when there is no dispute that the inadmissible facts or data forming the basis of the expert’s opinion...
Appeal No.
19-2334
Case
WhitServe LLC v. Dropbox, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “[W]hether . . . the enablement requirement of Section 112 is separate and distinct from the subject matter eligibility requirements of Section 101.” 2. “[W]hether . . . the Court...
Appeal No.
19-2164
Case
Trimble Inc. v. PerDiemCo LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether [Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc., 148 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 1998)]’s ‘approach that fosters settlement’ must be considered in assessing the fourth fairness factor-‘the interstate judicial...
Appeal No.
19-1925, 19-1926
Case
FG SRC, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the panel decision affirming a construction that excludes a preferred embodiment should be allowed to stand.”
Appeal No.
19-1506
Case
Free Stream Media Corp. v. Alphonso Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the panel decision is contrary to at least the following . . . precedents of this Court: Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Gree Shades Software, Inc., 882 F.3d 1121 (Fed....
Appeal No.
18-2170
Case
Bedgear, LLC v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Moot
Question(s) Presented
Bedgear, LLC asserts that “[e]n banc review is necessary to secure and maintain uniformity in the Court’s decisions in all pending cases that raise the same important constitutional question whether...
Appeal No.
18-1976, 18-2023
Case
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Subject
Patent8 Amici
Status
Moot
Question(s) Presented
“The questions concern whether induced infringement can be used to nullify a provision of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. Congress specified in Hatch-Waxman that when a drug is no longer patented and...
Appeal No.
21-1043, 21-1044, 21-1046
Case
Apple Inc. v. Optis Cellular Technology, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Court has jurisdiction to review a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denying a petition for inter partes review where the appeal argues that the decision...
Appeal No.
2019-1952, 2019-2394
Case
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c)(2) provides that a motion for sanctions ‘must be served under Rule 5, but it must not be filed or be presented to the court...
Appeal No.
20-2196
Case
Arunachalam v. Citigroup, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the lower and appellate courts have a ministerial duty to enforce the Law of the Case and Law of the Land.” “If so, when is this Court going to do...
Appeal No.
20-2132, 20-2211, 20-2212, 20-2213, 21-1033
Case
Apple Inc. v. Maxell, Ltd.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Court has jurisdiction to review a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denying a petition for inter partes review where the appeal argues that the decision...
Appeal No.
20-2091
Case
Bondyopadhyay v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Did the panel err in concluding that the Claims Court correctly dismissed the claims at issue for reasons of res judicata or for lack of subject matter jurisdiction?
Appeal No.
20-1806, 20-1808
Case
Baxter Corp. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Did the Board err when it used an uncited figure from a printed publication to “deci[de] to institute the subject IPR, and then find[] all challenged claims of [the ’273...