“Whether the ALJ legally erred in concluding that Celanese’s sales of products made by its secret, inventive process invalidate its patent claims on that process under the on-sale provision of...
1. “Whether the structure for instituting and funding AIA post-grant reviews violates the Due Process Clause in view of Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), and its progeny, which...
1. “Where SAS holds multiple copyright registrations affording it a statutory presumption of validity, and where it is well-settled that a defendant contesting the protectability of copied material must present...
1. “Were the railroad purpose easements obtained by the railroad as ‘voluntary grants’ broad enough to permit railbanking and the construction of a hiking and biking trail under the Trails...
1. “Did the district court err in concluding that all seven asserted patents in three distinct patent families comprising 211 total claims, each of which discloses discrete methods and systems...
“Whether the CFC’s judgment that the United States is liable for a taking of private property should be reversed on any of the following grounds:
1. The CFC applied an incorrect...
1. “Lobbying Costs. Absent narrow exceptions, Federal contractors are not allowed to charge the Government for lobbying activities. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 31.205-22 (reproduced at Addendum C). Raytheon includes a...
1. “Whether the district court committed legal and clear factual errors and otherwise abused its discretion in holding that Apple met its burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence,...
1. “First, in Section II.A., the plain language of the CDA, the FAR, the DFARS, and this Court’s precedent interpreting those authorities make clear that modifications unilaterally imposing prices, requiring...
1. “Whether the PTAB relied on the wrong legal standard in determining structural obviousness, because it ignored whether a skilled artisan: would have been motivated to deuterate ruxolitinib to alter...
“Whether, at Alice step one, Bard’s claims directed to vascular access ports containing, inter alia, structures such as a port body, a septum and an outlet stem and either a...
“Whether the BCNR erred by failing to give ‘liberal consideration’ to Doyon’s application seeking discharge relief related to his service-connected PTSD, including by failing to give liberal consideration when determining...
“Whether the Commission legally erred in holding that Panduit and Siemon imported ‘articles that . . . infringe’ under the importation requirement of 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B) based on its...
1. “Whether Uniloc, the undisputed owner of the patent-in-suit at the time the complaint was filed, had standing under Article III of the Constitution to sue for infringement of the...
Appeal:
1. “Does the issuance of a NITU by the STB trigger a per se categorical physical taking under the Trails Act, rendering any ‘causation’ standard inappropriate?”
2. “Does the duration of...
Appeal:
“Whether the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) erred in holding that it could certify a class that includes veterans over whom it lacks jurisdiction.”
Cross-Appeal:
1. “Whether...
1. “Whether the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records may exercise its powers under [10 U.S.C.] § 1552 to grant Mr. LaBonte disability retirement and amend his DD-214...
“The issue presented in this case is whether an AI-Generated Invention is patentable. The USPTO claims that it is not, filing a summary judgment motion to that effect, which was...
1. “Did the district court err in finding that Thales did not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of its counterclaim requesting that the district court declare...
1. “Whether the infringement judgment and/or damages award should be reversed or vacated because Centripetal did not prove—and the district court did not find—that Cisco made, used, offered for sale,...
