Appeal:
“Whether the Commission erred in determining that Apple did not violate Section 337 on the basis that claims 16 and 17 of the ’499 patent are invalid for lack of...
“Did the International Trade Commission (‘Commission’) err when it found that claims 1, 2, 11, 15, and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502 (‘the ‘502 patent’) are directed to an...
1. “Whether the Board erred in determining that claims 7-9 and 17-19 of the ’499 patent and claims 3, 5, 6, 19, 21, and 22 of the ’731 patent, which...
1. “Whether the district court erred in excluding evidence on invalidity and granting partial JMOL for plaintiffs on that issue.”
2. “Whether defendants are entitled to JMOL that claim 1 of...
1. “Article 3(n) of the Friant Contracts prohibits the United States from delivering San Joaquin River water to the Exchange Contractors unless and until ‘required’ to do so by the...
1. “Whether the Board erred in finding that for the limitation ‘an LED circuit array comprising an LED circuit comprising a plurality of LEDs connected in series’ is properly construed...
1. “Whether the district court erred in sua sponte raising and then granting judgment as a matter of law on patent ineligibility, an issue that was not tried because this...
1. “Did the Government injure Textron (a requirement for claim accrual) (a) when Textron’s predecessor-in-interest curtailed and terminated the pension plans in December 2012; or (b) when the Government disputed...
1. “Whether the district court erred in applying prosecution laches to declare the ’885 and ’966 patents unenforceable, based on nothing but standard continuation practice that did not extend the...
“The principal issue presented is whether the district court erred in limiting the terms ‘branched alkyl’ and ‘branched C10-C20 alkyl’ through lexicography to require one carbon atom in the group...
Appellants
1. “Whether the PTAB legally erred by failing to apply an objective standard for conception, and/or impermissibly awarded priority without identifying any inventive contribution by the purported inventor.”
2. “Whether...
Appeal:
1. “Does 28 U.S.C. § 1498 enable the Government to consent to patent infringement by AeroVironment where such consent breaches its contractual and statutory obligations to Lite, a Phase III...
1. ”Whether the Commission erred in concluding that Masimo established an existing domestic industry, including by:”
a. “holding Masimo satisfied the technical prong, even though the item identified in the complaint...
1. “Whether the district court erred as a matter of law in holding, under 35 U.S.C. § 101, that claims to laboratory-made host cells genetically engineered to contain DNA from...
1. “Whether the district court erred by declining to dismiss Micron’s BFA claims against Katana and Longhorn and by ordering that Katana’s patent infringement claims against Micron cannot proceed until...
“The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) currently pays the ‘actual cost’ of ground and air ambulance transports for eligible veterans and beneficiaries pursuant to its regulation at 38 C.F.R....
1. “Whether the district court’s order denying an antisuit injunction should be reversed because the court erred as a matter of law in finding, as a threshold matter, that resolving...
1. “Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying EFF’s motion to intervene.”
2. “Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying EFF’s motion to unseal court records.”
1. “Whether the district court erred by finding the ’993 patent, ’854 patent, and ’356 patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.”
2. “Whether the district court erred in its construction...
