Other Cases to Watch

Search By
Status
Subject
100 Cases
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Issue(s) Presented
Appeal No.
22-1827
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the ALJ legally erred in concluding that Celanese’s sales of products made by its secret, inventive process invalidate its patent claims on that process under the on-sale provision of...
Appeal No.
20-1400
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the structure for instituting and funding AIA post-grant reviews violates the Due Process Clause in view of Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), and its progeny, which...
Appeal No.
21-1542
Subject
Copyright10 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Where SAS holds multiple copyright registrations affording it a statutory presumption of validity, and where it is well-settled that a defendant contesting the protectability of copied material must present...
Appeal No.
22-1277
Subject
Takings2 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Were the railroad purpose easements obtained by the railroad as ‘voluntary grants’ broad enough to permit railbanking and the construction of a hiking and biking trail under the Trails...
Appeal No.
21-2251, 21-2291
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the district court err in concluding that all seven asserted patents in three distinct patent families comprising 211 total claims, each of which discloses discrete methods and systems...
Appeal No.
21-1849, 21-1875
Subject
Takings4 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the CFC’s judgment that the United States is liable for a taking of private property should be reversed on any of the following grounds: 1. The CFC applied an incorrect...
Appeal No.
21-2304
Subject
Gov. ContractAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Lobbying Costs. Absent narrow exceptions, Federal contractors are not allowed to charge the Government for lobbying activities. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 31.205-22 (reproduced at Addendum C). Raytheon includes a...
Appeal No.
21-2275
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the district court committed legal and clear factual errors and otherwise abused its discretion in holding that Apple met its burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence,...
Appeal No.
22-1035
Subject
ContractAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “First, in Section II.A., the plain language of the CDA, the FAR, the DFARS, and this Court’s precedent interpreting those authorities make clear that modifications unilaterally imposing prices, requiring...
Appeal No.
19-2011
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the PTAB relied on the wrong legal standard in determining structural obviousness, because it ignored whether a skilled artisan: would have been motivated to deuterate ruxolitinib to alter...
Appeal No.
22-1136, 22-1186
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether, at Alice step one, Bard’s claims directed to vascular access ports containing, inter alia, structures such as a port body, a septum and an outlet stem and either a...
Appeal No.
21-2095
Subject
Veterans3 Amici
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the BCNR erred by failing to give ‘liberal consideration’ to Doyon’s application seeking discharge relief related to his service-connected PTSD, including by failing to give liberal consideration when determining...
Appeal No.
22-1228
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the Commission legally erred in holding that Panduit and Siemon imported ‘articles that . . . infringe’ under the importation requirement of 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B) based on its...
Appeal No.
21-1555
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether Uniloc, the undisputed owner of the patent-in-suit at the time the complaint was filed, had standing under Article III of the Constitution to sue for infringement of the...
Appeal No.
21-2133
Subject
TakingsAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
Appeal: 1. “Does the issuance of a NITU by the STB trigger a per se categorical physical taking under the Trails Act, rendering any ‘causation’ standard inappropriate?” 2. “Does the duration of...
Appeal No.
21-1757
Subject
Veterans2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
Appeal: “Whether the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) erred in holding that it could certify a class that includes veterans over whom it lacks jurisdiction.” Cross-Appeal: 1.  “Whether...
Appeal No.
21-1432
Subject
Military2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records may exercise its powers under [10 U.S.C.] § 1552 to grant Mr. LaBonte disability retirement and amend his DD-214...
Appeal No.
21-2347
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“The issue presented in this case is whether an AI-Generated Invention is patentable. The USPTO claims that it is not, filing a summary judgment motion to that effect, which was...
Appeal No.
21-2106
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the district court err in finding that Thales did not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of its counterclaim requesting that the district court declare...
Appeal No.
21-1888
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the infringement judgment and/or damages award should be reversed or vacated because Centripetal did not prove—and the district court did not find—that Cisco made, used, offered for sale,...