Petitions - Fed Circuit Blog

| Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Search By

Status

Subject

256 Petitions

Docket No.

Case

Subject

Status

Question(s) Presented

Albright v. United States

Question(s) Presented

1. “Does constitutional federalism require a federal court that confronts an outcome-determinative and unresolved State law issue that is particularly within the expertise of a State court—here, whether railroad deeds...

Gossage v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the 60-day filing deadline is subject to equitable tolling beyond the control of the Petitioner or under ‘Unique or Personal Circumstances’ is warranted for ‘Want of Service’ or...

Gossage v. Office of Personnel Management

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Federal Circuit has [j]urisdiction or ‘lacks jurisdiction’ to determine its original and lower court’s jurisdiction in OPM Investigation Case 01-904-277 and OPM’s December 27, 2004 final decision,...

Gossage v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether Petitioner has standing to correct a jurisdictional error before the [l]ower [c]ourts for ‘want of jurisdiction’ or ‘jurisdiction on the merits,’ based on OPM’s December 27, 2004, final...

Gossage v. Office of Personnel Management

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether the Federal Circuit has [j]urisdiction or ‘lacks jurisdiction’ to determine its original and lower court’s jurisdiction in OPM Investigation Case 01-904-277 and its December 27, 2004 final decision,...

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings, LLC

Patent11 AmiciCVSG

Question(s) Presented

1. “What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is ‘directed to’ a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an...

Turner v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Question(s) Presented

1. “Did petitioner seek to get appeal heard by the Veteran’s Employment and Training Service of U.S. Department of Labor.” 2. “Did the U.S. Secretary of [L]abor properly investigate the Veterans...

VoIP-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is ‘directed to’ a patent-ineligible concept under step one of the Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an...

iLife Technologies, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

1. “What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is “directed to” a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the Court’s two-step framework for determining whether an...

Sharifi v. United States

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a United States citizen can be denied his Fifth Amendment rights to just compensation for property taken by the United States based upon foreign...

Meidinger v. United States

Question(s) Presented

1. “What are each courts’ jurisdiction authority and limitations of Whistleblower contracts of the Tax Court, and the Federal Claims Court, created under 26 USC § 7623(b)?” 2. “What are each...

Mooney v. United States

Question(s) Presented

1. “Who has Standing against the Mooneys as the Plaintiff and being the [] Real Party of Interest in the ‘Courts of the United States’ arising under Article III Sections...

Ultratec, Inc. v. CaptionCall, LLC

Question(s) Presented

1. “Does retroactive application of the inter partes review process violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution?” 2. “Does the use of Federal Circuit...

Kimble v. United States

Question(s) Presented

1. “Did the Court err in holding that Alice acted willfully, despite the lack of proof either that she had knowledge of the requirement to file an FBAR or of...

Robinson v. McDonough

Question(s) Presented

1. “Did the court of appeals violate constitutional rights of ‘[d]ue process’ and ‘[e]qual protection’ when it deferred to the [Board of Veterans’ Appeals] and failed to review according to...

Sonos, Inc. v. Implicit, LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether administrative patent judges are ‘principal’ or ‘inferior’ Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause.”

Hirshfeld v. Implicit, LLC

Question(s) Presented

“Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who must...

Biogen MA Inc. v. EMD Serono, Inc.

Question(s) Presented

“Whether courts may disregard the express claim term ‘recombinant’ so as to render a method-of-treatment patent anticipated—and thus invalid—in light of prior-art treatments that used the naturally occurring human protein,...

Kaszuba v. Hirshfeld

Question(s) Presented

1. “Has the Federal Circuit erred in refusing to follow this Court’s Lexmark precedent, and in not applying precedent to standing under 15 U.S.C. § 1064.” 2. “Has the Federal Circuit...

Naked TM, LLC v. Australian Therapeutic Supplies Pty. Ltd.

Question(s) Presented

1. “A majority of a Federal Circuit panel ruled that respondent has standing under 15 U.S.C. § 1064 to cancel petitioner’s trademark registration even though respondent had already agreed that...

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8