Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
501 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-5304
Case
Selby v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Did . . . Veteran Affairs act in Color of Law when they created a regulation and applied it as if it was an order of the District Court...
Docket No.
24-5296
Case
Payne v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-5177
Case
Reed v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Under the Whistleblower Protection Act, does an HR specialist who, after reporting her coworker and first level supervisor for harassment, engage in protected activity, sufficient to merit protection from...
Docket No.
24-47
Case
Return Mail, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Return Mail has a patent for processing undeliverable mail. This Court is familiar with it, since that patent was at issue in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service,...
Docket No.
24-320
Case
Soto v. United States
Subject
Veterans
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“This case determines whether thousands of medically retired combat veterans should receive all the combat related special compensation (CRSC) that Congress specifically authorized for combat veterans. The government has elected...
Docket No.
24-312
Case
Plotagraph, Inc. v. Lightricks, Ltd.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Inventors Troy Plota, Sascha Connelly and Plotagraph, Inc (Plotagraph) own and practice five patents that disclose applications allowing users to create the illusion of movement within a digital photograph or...
Docket No.
24-294
Case
Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Congress created the Hatch-Waxman Act with the purpose of hastening the introduction of less-costly generic drugs while safeguarding the legitimate patent rights of innovator companies. The lower court’s interpretation of...
Docket No.
24-292
Case
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. v. Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Subject
Procedure
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“This petition concerns core appellate procedure. In reviewing bench trials, the courts of appeals must ‘discuss’ and ‘analyze’ the district court’s findings, not make factual findings on their own. Icicle...
Docket No.
24-240
Case
W.J. v. Becerra
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“28 U.S.C. § 2501, which is explicitly jurisdictional in that it applies to ‘[e]very claim of which the United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction,’ provides that ‘[a] petition...
Docket No.
24-236
Case
Campbell v. Tube-Mac Industries, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “As Congress has signed the United States of America to the rules and stipulations of the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty and the Federal Circuit through Voda v. Cordis, 476...
Docket No.
24-187
Case
Kency v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Under Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 (VEOA), 5 U.S.C. 3330a, Congress established procedures for redress of alleged violations of veterans’ reemployment rights. Preference-eligible veterans contending that their rights have...
Docket No.
24-180
Case
Roku, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Section 337’s ‘domestic industry’ requirement is the gatekeeper to the International Trade Commission’s unique remedy of an exclusion order. For a patent owner complainant to establish a domestic industry, the...
Docket No.
24-114
Case
Zebra Technologies Corporation v. Intellectual Tech LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a party has Article III standing to assert a claim for patent infringement against an accused infringer who has the ability to obtain a license from a third...
Docket No.
23-868
Case
Flynn v. Department of State
Subject
MSPB2 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-866
Case
Nordby v. Social Security Administration
Subject
MSPB
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-861
Case
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation
Subject
MSPB10 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case presents a question of critical importance to hundreds of thousands of Americans who serve their country both as federal civilian employees and members of the Armed Services’ reserve...
Docket No.
23-713
Case
Bufkin v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans9 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“For more than a century, veterans have been entitled to the benefit of the doubt on any close issue relating to their eligibility for service-related benefits. As presently codified, ‘[w]hen...
Docket No.
23-21
Case
Harrow v. Department of Defense
Subject
MSPB5 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“When a federal employee petitions the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) provides:...
Docket No.
22-888
Case
Rudisill v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans16 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill, 38 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and under the Post-9/11 GI...
Docket No.
22-704
Case
Vidal v. Elster
Subject
Trademark8 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Section 1052(c) of Title 15 provides in pertinent part that a trademark shall be refused registration if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name . . . identifying a particular...