Search
Search | Sitemap Contact

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
82 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
19A886
Case
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
No question yet presented.
Docket No.
19-966
Case
Emerson Electric Co. v. SIPCO, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"Whether 35 U.S.C. 324(e) permits review on appeal of the Director’s threshold determination, as part of the decision to institute [Covered Business Method] review, that the challenged patent qualifies as...
Docket No.
19-852
Case
Maxell, Ltd. v. Fandango Media, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"Whether the claims at issue in Maxell’s patents are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. 101, as interpreted in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208...
Docket No.
19-832
Case
Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “A patented invention often makes but a small contribution to a complex end-product’s value. Thus, for well over a century, this Court has enforced the rule that a patentee...
Docket No.
19-829
Case
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“When a party files a petition for Inter Partes Review, the petition ‘must identify “each claim challenged,” the grounds for the challenge, and the evidence supporting the challenge. § 312(a)(3).’...
Docket No.
19-819
Case
Procopio v. Wilkie
Subject
Veterans
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether This Court Should Grant Certiorari to Resolve an Important Point of Law Concerning the Applicability of the ‘Substantially Justified’ Standard In Adjudicating Petitions for Attorneys Fees Under the...
Docket No.
19-801
Case
Cruz v. Wilkie
Subject
Veterans
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Over the last decade since Congress passed remedial legislation creating Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation (‘FVEC’), an astronomical fifty-six percent (56%) of all claimants have been denied that one-time benefit by...
Docket No.
19-7588
Case
Bible v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Whether the Federal Circuit correctly affirmed the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the claim in Bible’s...
Docket No.
19-7399
Case
Harris v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"Why was my demand denied when the defendant, the Commissioner of the IRS, admitted in writing that they didn’t have jurisdiction to take my...
Docket No.
19-619
Case
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
35 U.S.C. § 101 provides that a patent may be obtained for “any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof.”...
Docket No.
19-604
Case
Francway v. Wilkie
Subject
Veterans
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"Congress has established a veterans-benefits system that is uniquely pro-claimant. In veterans benefit cases, every statutory and regulatory presumption favors the veteran over the Department of Veterans Affairs. Despite this,...
Docket No.
19-601
Case
Collabo Innovations, Inc. v. Sony Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"When U.S. Patent No. 5,952,714 issued in September 1999, the Patent Act provided only two avenues for challenging the validity of the patent’s claims: ex parte reexamination and district court...
Docket No.
19-597
Case
Reese v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. "Whether this case provides an appropriate vehicle for this Court to state with clarity and certainty the definition of an 'abstract idea' under 35 U.S.C. § 101, so courts...
Docket No.
19-586
Case
Hollingsworth v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Subject
Veterans
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1984 (USERRA) provides reemployment rights to all employees serving in the uniformed services. See 38 U.S.C. §§ 4312-4318. Congress delegated the...
Docket No.
19-455
Case
Arris International Limited v. ChanBond, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. "Whether the Federal Circuit has appellate jurisdiction to review a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ('PTAB') denying institution of an inter partes review based on the...
Docket No.
19-1026
Case
Ford Motor Co. v. United States
Subject
Trade
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. "Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding, contrary to this Court’s precedent, that a product’s post-importation modification and use can determine its classification under a tariff heading that is...
Docket No.
19-1017
Case
Solutran, Inc. v. Elavon, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"Does Alice’s step one require that the claims be viewed as a whole and that consideration be given to the claimed advance over the prior...
Docket No.
19-1012
Case
General Electric Co. v. United Technologies, Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"Whether competitive harm alone suffices to confer Article III standing to appeal an IPR determination, or whether an appellant must also show concrete plans for future activity that creates a...
Docket No.
19-1002
Case
Automotive Body Parts Ass'n v. Ford Global Technologies, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"How should the article of manufacture be determined when applying the patent exhaustion and repair doctrines in design patent cases?"
Docket No.
18-1027
Case
Superior Communications, Inc. v. Voltstar Technologies, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
"An interested party can challenge a patent by filing a petition for 'inter partes review' ('IPR') with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the 'PTAB') within the Patent and Trademark...