Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
156 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-92
Case
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Promptu Systems Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether administrative patent judges are ‘principal’ or ‘inferior’ Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause.”
Docket No.
20-91
Case
Martin v. Department of Homeland Security
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“[Whether] the 4th [A]mendment to the [C]onstitution of the United States protects speech in my personally rented hotel room[,] my home for the period of rental time.” “[Whether] the United States...
Docket No.
20-88
Case
HZNP Finance Ltd. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the ‘basic and novel properties’ identified in connection with a patent claim’s transitional phrase ‘consisting essentially of’ must independently satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2,...
Docket No.
20-80
Case
Blodgett v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Did the court of appeals err in this FTC Act Sect. 13(b) case in failing to apply Rule 60(b) at the pleading stage, by not analyzing the Motion and...
Docket No.
20-74
Case
United States v. Image Processing Technologies LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who...
Docket No.
20-68
Case
Cheetah Omni LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Did the Federal Circuit violate Rodriguez when it invoked its own federal common law rule, superseding controlling state contract law, to hold that a patent license—one that does not expressly license...
Docket No.
20-5659
Case
Robles v. Wilkie
Subject
Veterans
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Did the fact that a response from the Respondent was not required in the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims cause the court to assume the Petitioner’s ‘Extraordinary Writ’...
Docket No.
20-5581
Case
Drevaleva v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Can the U.S. Court of Federal Claims compel an indigent Title VII Plaintiff to pay a filing fee at the time when the Plaintiff doesn’t have money at all,...
Docket No.
20-5532
Case
Golden v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“If the Government: on the Executive level accepts a person’s intellectual property, passes it on to a government agency to be used with the public without paying just compensation; on...
Docket No.
20-5444
Case
Sanders v. United States
Subject
Tucker Act
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. Whether “[r]espondent, by their own admissions, monetized Petitioner’s assets in the amount of $212,945 without jurisdiction and violated their own policies and procedures, Title 26 § 6212 and 6213...
Docket No.
20-5214
Case
Haynes v. Wilkie
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“How does Sargent Major Bowers gets the opportunity to submit 3 assassination attempts upon my life with Senator Dick Durbin’s staff in Chicago, Illinois?”  “How does Sargent Major Bowers give Wisconsin...
Docket No.
20-333
Case
Bozeman Financial LLC v. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the regional Federal Reserve Banks—the ‘operating arms’ of the Federal Reserve System, which is the central bank of the United States—are ‘distinct’ from the Federal Government, and qualify as...
Docket No.
20-325
Case
Whitserve LLC v. Donuts Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“If a patentee makes factual assertions that its claimed invention is directed to patent eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101, including assertions that the claimed invention does not...
Docket No.
20-32
Case
Morsa v. Iancu
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “May the Federal Circuit and Patent Office ignore this Court’s seminal Cuno decision?” 2. “May the Federal Circuit and Patent Office ignore Patent Office proof of no undue preemption?” 3. “May...
Docket No.
20-314
Case
RPM International Inc. v. Stuart
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the court of appeals erred by vacating and remanding the case based on an Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, challenge raised for the...
Docket No.
20-273
Case
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Rovi Guides, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the United States Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers...
Docket No.
20-271
Case
Vilox Technologies, LLC v. Iancu
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the court of appeals’ severance remedy of the Appointments Clause violation of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) is consistent with congressional intent, where Congress has long considered tenure protections...
Docket No.
20-260
Case
Personal Audio, LLC v. CBS Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Must the collateral estoppel effect of an inter partes review be raised and litigated in the appeal of the inter partes review, rather than in the court in which...
Docket No.
20-258
Case
Medina v. Federal Aviation Administration
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Alvin E Medina, the Petitioners, request this Petition for Writ of Certiorari be granted given the salient issue equitable tolling, and the constitutional matter of proper notice of appeal rights...
Docket No.
20-228
Case
ESIP Series 2, LLC v. Puzhen Life USA, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether Board decisions that are arbitrary and capricious, exceed the Board’s statutory jurisdiction from the start, and are made by administrative patent judges holding that position in violation of...