Adams v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Pro Se

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1212 (DC- 3443-22-0385-1-1) which was about Mr. Waschull colluding with his former employer, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). And whether Employer Discrimination is going to be allowed to flourish in the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). And whether CAFC Violated Constitutional Law when they failed to address the discrimination by MDA and the collusion by DIA.”

2. “Whether anyone or any organization can deny access to EEO records in a Discrimination Case, Complaint or Appeal. And whether MDA can intentionally withhold vital evidence they have in their possession that would change the outcome of the CAFC decision, such as the H: harddrive containing dates, times, and people for numerous instances of disparate treatment, discrimination and retaliation, the EEO records of the discriminators and the EEO records of the discriminating organization, and The FBI investigation that cleared Mr. Adams of any wrongdoing.”

3. “Whether CAFC can deny an Oral Argument Request for a case of this magnitude and have justice prevail. And whether Mr. Adams’ Sixth Amendment Rights were violated when CAFC disregarded/ignored my request for an oral argument, in effect, denying him of his right to be heard, and denying him of his right to face his accuser.”

Posts About this Case

Proceedings and Orders
September 14, 2023
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
October 10, 2023
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.