1. “Did the district court err by failing to consider the combined weight and effect of evidence demonstrating Hikma’s repeated extra-label encouragement of using their generic version of Amarin’s patented...
1. “Does the issuance of an Order compelling a non-party to come from Texas to Delaware to testify at a post-dismissal hearing violate that non-party’s rights under Federal Rule of...
1. “Whether enactment of the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act of 2017 (‘AMA’), 115 Pub. L. No. 55, 131 Stat. 1105 (Aug. 23, 2017) really does permit the Board...
“Section 9021(b) of Title 15 provides that the ‘Secretary [of Labor] shall provide to any covered individual unemployment benefit assistance . . . .’ Plaintiffs allege that they were ‘covered...
“Whether the Board’s decision was not in accordance with the law when it determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear Appellant’s appeal based on its conclusion that Appellant has not...
According to Salix:
“Two patents claim methods of treating IBS-D using a specific dosage of rifaximin: 550 mg administered three times a day (1,650 mg per day) for 14 days.”
1. “In...
“[O]nce a plaintiff has established a prima facie case under the Equal Pay Act, is an agency’s reliance on prior salary alone sufficient to carry its burden of establishing as...
1. “Did the Trial Court erroneously conclude the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (the ‘Corps’’) denial of Lemon Bay’s wetland permit did not constitute a categorical taking of Lemon...
1. “Whether the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) erred in issuing a writ of mandamus that did not aid its exercise of actual or prospective...
“Whether it was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, clearly erroneous, or otherwise not in accordance with the law for:”
“Judge Davis to uncritically accept that the Special Master had the...
1. “Whether the domicile address requirement is invalid because it is not a logical outgrowth of the PTO’s notice of proposed rulemaking, which affirmatively repudiated any impact on U.S. applicants...
1. “Whether the structure for instituting and funding AIA post-grant reviews violates the Due Process Clause in view of Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), and its progeny, which...
1. “Whether, in using the term ‘modification’ in Section 204(b)(1)(B), Congress limited the President to ‘trade-liberalizing’ modifications, prohibiting the President from modifying a safeguard to revoke an improvidently-granted exclusion and...
1. “Whether patent term adjustments should be treated in the same way as patent term extensions for purposes of non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting.”
2. “Whether a patent can become a basis...
1. “Whether the PTAB relied on the wrong legal standard in determining structural obviousness, because it ignored whether a skilled artisan: would have been motivated to deuterate ruxolitinib to alter...
1. “Did the district court err in concluding that all seven asserted patents in three distinct patent families comprising 211 total claims, each of which discloses discrete methods and systems...
1. “Whether summary judgment on Teradata’s tying claim should be reversed because the district court erroneously (a) excluded testimony from Teradata’s expert economist; (b) refused to apply the per se...
1. “Whether the special master abused his discretion by denying relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(1) when a mistake of fact infected the special master’s decision denying compensation.”
2. “Whether the...
1. “Whether the Board erred in finding that Besanceney’s December 2016 disclosure to his supervisors about the lack of probable cause for a search warrant was not protected, when that...
1. “Whether the magistrate judge erred in holding that Mr. Jenkins could not assert a compensable takings claim arising from the federal government’s physical appropriation of his property outside of...
