Beaudette v. McDonough

 
APPEAL NO.
22-1264
OP. BELOW
OPINION
TBD
SUBJECT
Veterans
AUTHOR
TBD

Issue(s) Presented

1. “Whether the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) erred in issuing a writ of mandamus that did not aid its exercise of actual or prospective jurisdiction, but rather expanded it.”

2. “Whether the Veterans Court erred when it held that claimants-appellees Jeremy and Maya Beaudette, acting on behalf of a class, were entitled to a writ of mandamus because they: 1) did not have adequate alternative means to obtain their desired relief; and 2) had a clear and indisputable right to the writ.”