Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Other Cases to Watch

Search By
Status
Subject
157 Cases
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Issue(s) Presented
Appeal No.
22-1843
Case
In re Chestek PLLC
Subject
TrademarkAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the domicile address requirement is invalid because it is not a logical outgrowth of the PTO’s notice of proposed rulemaking, which affirmatively repudiated any impact on U.S. applicants...
Appeal No.
20-1400
Case
New Vision Gaming & Development, Inc. v. LNW Gaming, Inc.
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the structure for instituting and funding AIA post-grant reviews violates the Due Process Clause in view of Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), and its progeny, which...
Appeal No.
22-1392
Case
Solar Energy Industries Association v. United States
Subject
TradeAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether, in using the term ‘modification’ in Section 204(b)(1)(B), Congress limited the President to ‘trade-liberalizing’ modifications, prohibiting the President from modifying a safeguard to revoke an improvidently-granted exclusion and...
Appeal No.
22-1293, 22-1294, 22-1295, 22-1296
Case
In re Cellect, LLC
Subject
Patent6 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether patent term adjustments should be treated in the same way as patent term extensions for purposes of non-statutory obviousness-type double patenting.” 2. “Whether a patent can become a basis...
Appeal No.
19-2011
Case
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. v. Incyte Corporation
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the PTAB relied on the wrong legal standard in determining structural obviousness, because it ignored whether a skilled artisan: would have been motivated to deuterate ruxolitinib to alter...
Appeal No.
21-2251, 21-2291
Case
Realtime Data LLC v. Array Networks Inc.
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the district court err in concluding that all seven asserted patents in three distinct patent families comprising 211 total claims, each of which discloses discrete methods and systems...
Appeal No.
22-1286
Case
Teradata Corp. v. SAP SE
Subject
Antitrust2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether summary judgment on Teradata’s tying claim should be reversed because the district court erroneously (a) excluded testimony from Teradata’s expert economist; (b) refused to apply the per se...
Appeal No.
22-1854
Case
DiMasi v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Subject
Vaccine3 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the special master abused his discretion by denying relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(1) when a mistake of fact infected the special master’s decision denying compensation.” 2. “Whether the...
Appeal No.
22-1271
Case
Besanceney v. Department of Homeland Security
Subject
MSPBAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Board erred in finding that Besanceney’s December 2016 disclosure to his supervisors about the lack of probable cause for a search warrant was not protected, when that...
Appeal No.
22-1378
Case
Jenkins v. United States
Subject
Takings2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the magistrate judge erred in holding that Mr. Jenkins could not assert a compensable takings claim arising from the federal government’s physical appropriation of his property outside of...
Appeal No.
21-1849, 21-1875
Case
Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Takings4 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the CFC’s judgment that the United States is liable for a taking of private property should be reversed on any of the following grounds: 1. The CFC applied an incorrect...
Appeal No.
22-1292
Case
In re Cellect, LLC
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the Board err by disregarding the plain meaning of the claims in light of the claim language and specification that require the claimed ‘time select switch . ....
Appeal No.
22-1581
Case
City of Wilmington v. United States
Subject
Clean Water ActAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the court erred by applying the Contract Disputes Act’s appellate standard of de novo  review.” 2. “Whether the court erred by (a) disregarding as irrelevant or giving little weight...
Appeal No.
22-1915
Case
Cooperman v. Social Security Administration
Subject
Pro SeAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Can the full MSPB authorize removal of an Administrative Law Judge based in part on that Judge’s explicit adherence to written Agency Policy?” 2. “Can the full MSPB deprive Petitioner...
Appeal No.
22-1564
Case
Dixon v. United States
Subject
TaxAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. Whether “[t]he Claims Court committed clear error by holding that ‘valid informal claims are only those that [have] not misled the [IRS] and [have been] accepted and treated by...
Appeal No.
22-1035
Case
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. v. Secretary of the Air Force
Subject
ContractAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals erred in holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Lockheed Martin’s appeal from two Air Force modifications that unilaterally definitized contract...
Appeal No.
22-1228
Case
FS.COM Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the Commission legally erred in holding that Panduit and Siemon imported ‘articles that . . . infringe’ under the importation requirement of 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B) based on its...
Appeal No.
21-1542
Case
SAS Institute Inc. v. World Programming Ltd.
Subject
Copyright11 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Where SAS holds multiple copyright registrations affording it a statutory presumption of validity, and where it is well-settled that a defendant contesting the protectability of copied material must present...
Appeal No.
21-1695
Case
Gorge Design Group LLC v. Xuansheng
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the district court clearly erred and/or abused discretion in determining that each of Gorge’s causes of action were not baseless or frivolous.” 2. “Whether the district court clearly erred...
Appeal No.
22-1249
Case
Apple Inc. v. Vidal
Subject
Jurisdiction3 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) bars Appellants’ challenge to the NHK-Fintiv Rule, where Appellants’ suit does not seek to appeal any institution decision but instead seeks to set the Rule...