Other Cases to Watch

Search By
Status
Subject
91 Cases
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Issue(s) Presented
Appeal No.
20-1637
Subject
VeteransAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) misinterpreted the plain language of 38 U.S.C. §§ 3322 and 3327 in holding that the election provisions expressly contained therein do...
Appeal No.
21-139
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the district court erred by holding that Plaintiffs’ pre-filing assignment of geographically limited patent rights to a newly minted related entity precluded transfer regardless of the convenience of...
Appeal No.
20-1735
Subject
Death Benefit2 Amici
Status
Dismissed
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether it is unlawful for the federal government to rely on a state’s concededly unconstitutional definition of marriage to deny survivor benefits to the surviving member of a long-term, committed...
Appeal No.
20-2067
Subject
Veterans2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Did the holding in Ortiz v. Principi misinterpret 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.102 by setting forth an equipose-of-the-evidence [sic] standard for veterans to prove their claims...
Appeal No.
21-141
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Dismissed
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the district court clearly abused its discretion by failing to meaningfully exercise its discretion and instead implementing a standard whereby virtually no patent infringement case would be subject to...
Appeal No.
20-1399
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the unusual structure for instituting and funding AIA post-grant reviews violates the Due Process Clause in view of Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), and its progeny, which...
Appeal No.
19-2164
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the district court err in concluding that it cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over PerDiemCo even though (a) PerDiemCo expressly and repeatedly accused Trimble, a company based in northern...
Appeal No.
20-1834
Subject
JurisdictionAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether, for the purpose of a jurisdictional ruling prior to hearing, the Board erred in failing to consider whether Dr. Tao had engaged in protected activity under 5 U.S.C. §...
Appeal No.
20-1072
Subject
Veterans2 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
Whether “[t]he Veterans Court’s ‘direct relationship’ requirement is an erroneous legal standard for determining what facts are before the Board because it excludes relevant matters that are known or should...
Appeal No.
21-112
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the district court abused its discretion in declining to apply the first-to- file rule by: (1) erroneously concluding that the WDTX’s decision regarding the ’606 patent could conflict with the...
Appeal No.
20-1074
Subject
Patent4 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the district court erred in holding that any reasonable juror was required to find that Sanofi-Regeneron established non-enablement by clear-and- convincing evidence.”
Appeal No.
20-1305
Subject
Veterans4 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Did the CAVC misinterpret 38 U.S.C. § 7261(a)(2) in holding that a five-year delay in deciding a disabled veteran’s administrative appeal does not amount to an unreasonable delay.” “Did the CAVC...
Appeal No.
18-1364
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the Board acted contrary to law or arbitrarily and capriciously in denying SIPCO’s motion seeking leave to request a certificate of correction from the Director of the Patent Office,...
Appeal No.
20-1175
Subject
VeteransAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“The issues on appeal center on the interplay of the Rule of Two mandate in 38 U.S.C. §§ 8127, 8128 and the printing mandate in 44 U.S.C. § 501 requiring...
Appeal No.
19-2147
Subject
Gov. ContractAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the ASBCA erred in holding that DFARS 252.227-7013 precludes government contractors from marking technical data delivered to the Government in a manner that (a) recognizes the Government’s unlimited rights...
Appeal No.
19-2078, 19-2080, 19-2090, 19-2316
Subject
TakingsAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“Whether the five original conveyance deeds at issue granted easements or fee simple ownership to the railroad under Oregon law.”
Appeal No.
18-2338
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
“I. Network-1’s Appeal A. Independent Basis for Verdict: Does the evidence compel a finding of non-infringement irrespective of the challenged constructions? B. Claim Construction: 1. Did the district court properly construe ‘low level...
Appeal No.
19-2039
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Dismissed
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether, in determining that Patent No. 6,477,151 (the ‘151’, or the ‘’151 Patent’) is unenforceable, the district court committed an error of law in failing to apply a ‘but...
Appeal No.
19-1094
Subject
Veterans5 Amici
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Did the CAVC misinterpret Rule 23(a)’s commonality requirement to require that a proposed class of disabled veterans seeking class certification of claims alleging unreasonable system-wide delay always identify a...
Appeal No.
19-1133
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Decided
Issue(s) Presented
1. “Whether the asserted claims are invalid because: (1) They were anticipated by the prior art; or (2)They are not enabled and lack sufficient written description.” 2. “Whether the asserted claims...