Late yesterday, the Federal Circuit released a nonprecedential order dismissing an appeal. This morning, the Court released two nonprecedential opinions and three nonprecedential orders. One of the nonprecedential opinions comes in a patent case appealed from the Eastern District of Virginia, and the other comes in a government contracts case appealed from the Court of Federal Claims. One nonprecedential order denies a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, one withdraws a petition for a writ of mandamus to the Eastern District of Texas, and the last order dismisses an appeal. Here are the introductions to the opinions and the orders other than dismissals, as well as links to the dismissals.
Sansone v. United States Patent and Trademark Office (Nonprecedential)
Stanley A. Sansone appeals the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia’s memorandum order dismissing his case and denying his motion for summary judgment. For the reasons below, we affirm.
Utech, Inc. v. United States (Nonprecedential)
Utech, Inc., d/b/a EndoSoft (“Utech”) appeals a decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing all claims of Utech’s bid protest complaint. Utech, Inc. v. United States, 171 Fed. Cl. 58 (2024) (“Decision”). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
In re Hovgaard (Nonprecedential Order)
Kim Anthony Hovgaard petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims to vacate a May 15, 2026, order granting the Secretary of Veterans Affairs an extension of time, declare the Department of Veterans Affairs in default, and issue an immediate panel decision on his case.
In re Seagate Technology Holdings PLC (Nonprecedential Order)
Seagate Technology Holdings plc et al. move with consent to withdraw their petition for a writ of mandamus and for the parties to bear their own costs.