FedCircuitBlog

Late yesterday, the Federal Circuit released two nonprecedential orders dismissing petitions. This morning, the Federal Circuit released two precedential opinions, two nonprecedential opinions, and one nonprecedential order. One of the precedential opinions comes in a response to a petition seeking to have the en banc court reconsider a panel’s review of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board. Today’s nonprecedential order explains that the en banc court granted rehearing in response to the petition and the withdrew and replaced the panel’s opinion with a modified opinion that includes one part that is joined by all of the active judges that participated in the vote on rehearing. The other precedential opinion comes in a patent case appealed from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. One of the nonprecedential opinions comes in a case appealed from the Court of Federal Claims, and the other comes in a patent case appealed from the Western District of Pennsylvania. Here are the introductions to the opinions and today’s order as well as links to the dismissals.

This morning, the Federal Circuit released a nonprecedential order summarily affirming a judgment of the Court of Federal Claims. Here is the introduction to the order.

Today the Federal Circuit released five nonprecedential orders and one errata. One of the orders comes in a patent case decided by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and it grants motions to dismissal the appeal as moot and also vacates the PTAB’s final written decision. Another order comes in a veterans case, and it dismisses an appeal and denies a petition. The third order grants an unopposed motion by the Merit Systems Protection Board to remand a case. The other two orders are dismissals. Here are the introductions to the first three orders as well as links to the errata and dismissals.

Today the Federal Circuit released two precedential opinions, a precedential order, and two nonprecedential orders dismissing cases. Both of the precedential opinions come in trade cases, and in both cases the court affirms the judgment of the Court of International Trade. In the precedential order, the Federal Circuit denies panel and en banc rehearing in a design patent cases. Notably, Judge Cunningham joined by Judge Hughes released an opinion concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc , while Chief Judge Moore joined by Judge Reyna released an opinion dissenting from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. Here are the introductions to the opinions and links to the dismissals.

Here is an update on recent activity at the Supreme Court in cases decided by the Federal Circuit. There are currently no pending cases previously decided by the Federal Circuit. As for pending petitions, since our last update, two new petitions were filed in a patent case and a pro se case, and a waiver of the right to respond to a petition was filed in another pro se case Here are the details.

Here is an update on recent activity at the Supreme Court in cases decided by the Federal Circuit. There are currently no pending cases previously decided by the Federal Circuit. As for pending petitions, since our last update, three new petitions were filed in a patent case and two pro se cases. Here are the details.

Late yesterday, the Federal Circuit released a nonprecedential order dismissing an appeal. This morning, the court released two precedential opinions and one nonprecedential opinion. The first precedential opinion comes in a Tucker Act case appealed from the Court of Federal Claims. The second precedential opinion and the nonprecedential opinion come in separate patent cases appealed from the Southern District of Florida. Here are the introductions to the opinions as well as a link to the dismissal.

This morning the Federal Circuit released two precedential opinions, three nonprecedential opinions, five nonprecedential orders, and one Rule 36 summary affirmance. One of the precedential opinions comes in a case involving correction of military records appealed from the Court of Federal Claims; the other is a case involving tariffs appealed from the Court of International Trade. One of the nonprecedential opinions comes in a patent case appealed form the District of Wyoming, one comes in a veterans case appealed from the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, and one comes in a patent case appealed form the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Two nonprecedential orders come in a cases appealed from the Court of Federal Claims, one transfers an appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and two dismiss petitions. Here are the introductions to the opinions and substantive orders along with links to the summary affirmance and dismissals.

Here is an update on recent activity at the Supreme Court in cases decided by the Federal Circuit. There are currently no pending cases previously decided by the Federal Circuit. As for pending petitions, since our last update, one waiver of the right to respond to a petition was filed in a pro se case and one brief in opposition was filed in a veterans case. Here are the details.

Earlier this month the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Bee v. United States, a case involving correction of military records that we have been following because it attracted two amicus briefs. In this case, William Bee appealed the denial of his request to have his military records reflect medical retirement rather than voluntary separation. In an opinion authored by Judge Reyna and joined by Judges Clevenger and Chen, the court vacated the judgment and remanded the case. This is our summary of the opinion.