Here is an update on recent en banc activity at the Federal Circuit in patent cases. Since our last update, two new petitions for en banc rehearing were filed, one raising questions related to claim construction and Rule 36 summary affirmances and one raising questions related to awards of attorneys’ fees and obviousness. The Federal Circuit also denied petitions for en banc rehearing in two cases, one raising a question related to claim construction and one raising questions related to Rule 36 summary affirmances. Here are the details.
Recent En Banc Activity
Here is an update on recent en banc activity at the Federal Circuit. Since our last update, one new en banc petition has been filed, raising a question regarding the appropriateness of Rule 36 summary affirmances; amicus briefs were filed in two patent cases raising questions related to standing and obviousness-type double patenting; and the court denied a petition in a pro se case. Here are the details.
Opinions & Orders – August 8, 2025
Late yesterday, the Federal Circuit released a nonprecedential order dismissing an appeal. This morning, the court released a precedential opinion in a patent case appealed from the District of New Jersey. The Federal Circuit also released two nonprecedential opinions in decisions appealed from the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Finally, the court released two Rule 36 summary affirmances. Here are the introductions to the opinions and links to the Rule 36 summary affirmances and dismissal.
Today’s Opinions – November 27, 2019
This morning the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in a government contract case, a precedential opinion in a takings case, and a nonprecedential order in a patent case. Here are the introductions.
Today’s Opinions – November 15, 2019
This morning the Federal Circuit issued one precedential opinion in a patent case, one precedential opinion in a Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals case, one nonprecedential opinion in a Court of Federal Claims case, one nonprecedential order in a patent case, and one precedential erratum. Here are the introductions to the opinions.