Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
Supreme Court Petitions
Search By
Status
Any
Pending
Granted
Denied
Dismissed
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Clean Water Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Equal Pay Act
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
497 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-141
Case
Martin v. Bexar County
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Before the Court is a novel case and controversy involving a patent related conflict of laws. The case was removed from state court after the expiration of the applicable statute...
Docket No.
23-137
Case
Crews v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“When a veteran with a pending benefits claim dies, Congress expressly allows a surviving spouse to be ‘substituted as the claimant.’ 38 U.S.C. § 5121A. Mrs. Crews was granted permission...
Docket No.
23-135
Case
Intel Corp. v. Vidal
Subject
Patent
3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Congress established inter partes review (IPR) to provide an efficient administrative alternative to litigation for challenging the validity of dubious patents. The Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office...
Docket No.
23-127
Case
Cooperman v. Social Security Administration
Subject
Employment
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Petitioner, who was employed as an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) by Respondent, was the subject of removal proceedings for ‘conduct unbecoming of an ALJ.’ Petitioner asserted that such a charge...
Docket No.
23-113
Case
Pohl v. United States
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Is the proper standard of review for an appeal to correct a military record 10 U.S.C. § 1552 as stated in both the statute and Respondents DD Form 149, or...
Docket No.
23-1052
Case
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. v. Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether function must be disregarded in defining the scope of comparison prior art relevant to design patent infringement.” 2. “Whether comparison prior art can be considered in evaluating design patent...
Docket No.
23-1023
Case
Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Is it permissible for the Federal Circuit to issue a Rule 36 Judgment, affirming certain claims as anticipated, where the Federal Circuit has been presented with inconsistent claim constructions...
Docket No.
23-1001
Case
Golden v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-99
Case
Barrett v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In 2012, the Government expropriated the net worth of private companies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, by arrogating for itself the Companies’ earnings in perpetuity. The Federal Circuit held this...
Docket No.
22-98
Case
Cacciapalle v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (‘FHFA’) placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship, and on behalf of each entity entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement...
Docket No.
22-97
Case
Owl Creek Asia I, L.P. v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are ‘for-profit corporations owned by private shareholders’ and ‘dominate the secondary mortgage market.’ Collins v. Yellen, 141 S. Ct. 1761, 1770, 1785 (2021). In 2008,...
Docket No.
22-961
Case
Steeves v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether Congresses’ Mandatory Exceptions, found in Public Law 91-172 at 508(c)(1)(A), 83 Stat 494- 495 & 6033(a)(2)A)(i), 83 Stat 519-520 for ‘churches, their integrated auxiliaries’, from compliance with Congresses’...
Docket No.
22-930
Case
ESET, LLC v. Finjan LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The questions presented are:” 1. “In a case of first impression for this Court, where a patentee expressly defines a claim term, may the Federal Circuit disregard its decades-old precedent that...
Docket No.
22-927
Case
Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The America Invents Act created inter partes review, an adversarial proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in which third parties may challenge the patentability of an existing patent...
Docket No.
22-925
Case
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Unified Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The question presented is the same as that in Arthrex Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., Arthrocare Corp; and United States of America, No. 22-639 (filed January 8, 2023):” “The Federal...
Docket No.
22-919
Case
Thaler v. Vidal
Subject
Patent
3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“‘The primary meaning of the word “invention” in the Patent Act unquestionably refers to the inventor’s conception.’ Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc., 525 U.S. 55, 60 (1998). Here, it is...
Docket No.
22-873
Case
Ingenio, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies LP
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The questions presented are:” 1. “Whether 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)’s IPR estoppel provision applies only to claims addressed in the final written decision, even if other claims were or could have...
Docket No.
22-845
Case
Thornton v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
22-822
Case
Avery Dennison Corp. v. ADASA Inc.
Subject
Patent
2 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) tags are encoded with lengthy serial numbers that uniquely identify particular items. The patent at issue in this case designates the leading bits in a...
Docket No.
22-819
Case
Wakefield v. Blackboard
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13