Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
Supreme Court Petitions
Search By
Status
Any
Pending
Granted
Denied
Dismissed
Closed
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Clean Water Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Equal Pay Act
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
546 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-768
Case
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Subject
Patent
3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 103 of title 35 of the U.S. Code provides that an invention is not patentable if it ‘would have been obvious’ to a person of ordinary skill in the...
Docket No.
23-740
Case
Golden v. Qualcomm, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-739
Case
Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In conducting an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103, did the Federal Circuit err in holding that there ‘is no basis in our case law’ for requiring an articulated...
Docket No.
23-7384
Case
Mandry v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether participation in the Congress-authorized 2017 and 2020 plebiscite for Puerto Ricans, on statehood elections, constitutes an implied in fact contract for the purposes of a Tucker Act claim...
Docket No.
23-7380
Case
Caldwell v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-7233
Case
Ottah v. National Grid
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-7208
Case
Yifru v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“A consular officer issued a visa to an alien, without executing the application under oath as required by statute. Nevertheless, the officer exacted him a discretionary fee —to get a ‘new...
Docket No.
23-7140
Case
Wright v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Veterans Judicial Review Act of 1988 affords judicial review of the Article I veteran-benefit administrative process, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7261 in the Court of Appeals for Veterans...
Docket No.
23-7127
Case
Akerman v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Jurisdiction Over Habeas Corpus Decisions from the Federal Circuit: Does jurisdiction over habeas corpus decisions originating within the administrative state, particularly those adjudicated by the Federal Circuit, reside under...
Docket No.
23-6984
Case
Ottah v. Verifone System Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-69
Case
PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Trade
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether separation of powers principles require courts to resolve ambiguity in statutory limits on delegations of vast legislative power to the Executive in a way that constrains the delegation...
Docket No.
23-6736
Case
Chin-Young v. Department of the Army
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether covered Federal employees under employment-at-will have an absolute right to constitutionally sound due process procedures under MSPB administrative law.” 2. “Whether Federal employees-whistle blowers are entitled to de novo legal...
Docket No.
23-607
Case
Glover v. Cohen
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Is this a case of patent infringement where judges are abusing Summary Judgment at the request of the law firm; which showed bias, and prejudice toward a Pro Se...
Docket No.
23-5760
Case
Lomax v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-575
Case
Tehrani v. Hamilton Technologies LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by declaring a non-expert as a POSITA despite all the evidence presented to the contrary.” 2. “Whether the Court of...
Docket No.
23-574
Case
Traxcell Technologies LLC v. Sprint Communications Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Where petitioner’s patent infringement claims were not finally rejected until the district court judge approved the Magistrate Judge’s ruling disposing of same, can petitioner’s conduct in pressing its claims...
Docket No.
23-5543
Case
Aljindi v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-543
Case
Hampton v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “When the VA fails to adjudicate the disposition of a claim for benefits, may a reviewing Court find that the VA meant to implicitly deny the claim, without running...
Docket No.
23-5179
Case
Becirovic v. Vidal
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-498
Case
Realtime Data LLC v. Fortinet, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Amicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 101 of the Patent Act of 1952, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., provides that ‘any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
