Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
380 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
21-364
Case
Mohapatra v. Hirshfeld
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether computer-based process improvement patent applications for inventions by Citizen Inventors–characterized by narrow and well-defined practical solutions to clearly identified actual/existing problems which do not preempt any future inventions–[as a...
Docket No.
21-36
Case
Gossage v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether Petitioner has standing to correct a jurisdictional error before the [l]ower [c]ourts for ‘want of jurisdiction’ or ‘jurisdiction on the merits,’ based on OPM’s December 27, 2004, final...
Docket No.
21-35
Case
Gossage v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit has [j]urisdiction or ‘lacks jurisdiction’ to determine its original and lower court’s jurisdiction in OPM Investigation Case 01-904-277 and its December 27, 2004 final decision,...
Docket No.
21-249
Case
Bondyopadhyay v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
21-245
Case
Pyrotechnic Specialties, Inc. v. Secretary of Defense
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Is a litigant entitled to have the correct standard of law applied by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals or does a ‘right for any reason’ doctrine apply?” “Is a...
Docket No.
21-244
Case
Taylor & Sons, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Does the fact that the property is generating profits on the date of taking satisfy the economic impact requirement to find a regulatory taking under Penn Central?” “Does Penn Central provide...
Docket No.
21-233
Case
Mike Finnin Motors, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the novel Federal Circuit ‘but for’ defense to takings liability conflicts with Ark. Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, 568 U.S. 23 (2012) (categorical defenses are barred in...
Docket No.
21-209
Case
Hu v. Hirshfeld
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the PTO’s varied standards, buttressed by the decisional law of the lower reviewing courts, for determining operability under § 101 are biased towards conventional inventions but against groundbreaking...
Docket No.
21-202
Case
Mylan Laboratories Ltd. v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V.
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Does 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) categorically preclude appeal of all decisions not to institute inter partes review?” 2. “Is the NHK-Fintiv Rule substantively and procedurally...
Docket No.
21-193
Case
Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Can a document qualify as a printed publication if it is stored on a password-protected website, not accessible to the public, and available only to customers who pay over $25,000...
Docket No.
21-170
Case
Rain Computing, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether a patent claim may be invalidated for indefiniteness only if, under 35 U.S.C. § 112, para. 2 (now subsection 112(b)) as construed by Nautilus, Inc. u. Biosig Instruments,...
Docket No.
21-158
Case
Bobcar Media, LLC v. Aardvark Event Logistics, Inc.
Subject
Rule 36
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Court should resolve the circuit split under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 36 (wherein a minority of circuit courts issue judgments without any explanation of their decisions),...
Docket No.
21-1567
Case
Biogen International GmbH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Biogen’s asserted patent, which claims methods of treating multiple sclerosis by orally administering 480 mg/day of dimethyl fumarate (DMF), expressly states that ‘an effective dose of DMF … to be...
Docket No.
21-1566
Case
Juno Therapeutics, Inc. v. Kite Pharma, Inc.
Subject
Patent5 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 112(a) of Title 35, United States Code, requires that a patent include a ‘specification,’ which ‘shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process...
Docket No.
21-1554
Case
Worlds Inc. v. Activision Blizzard Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In the mid-1990s, petitioner Worlds invented computer software with protocols that allowed an increased number of players to access a three-dimensional virtual world simultaneously, and provided customizable settings to adapt...
Docket No.
21-154
Case
Mankaruse v. Raytheon Company
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Honorable United States Supreme Court must defend our Great United States Constitution?” 2. “Whether the Honorable United States Supreme Court must defend American Citizens rights to equally live...
Docket No.
21-153
Case
Mankaruse v. Intel Corporation
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Honorable United States Supreme Court must defend our Great United States Constitution?” 2. “Whether the Honorable United States Supreme Court must defend American Citizens rights to equally live...
Docket No.
21-1527
Case
CustomPlay, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) violated the statutory text and legislative intent of the America Invents Act (AIA) by delegating the PTO Director’s responsibility to determine whether to...
Docket No.
21-1526
Case
Hyatt v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
Subject
Procedure
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Petitioner Gilbert Hyatt brought this action to challenge the Patent and Trademark Office’s secret rule, attested to by former agency officials and reflected in its official actions, to deny him...
Docket No.
21-1510
Case
Marana v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“What court, tribunal, and or investigative agency ensures that information with redacted infor­mation when presented as evidence is valid, legal, and not used for misinformation?” “Is ‘such that a reasonable person...