Pro Se

Question(s) Presented

1. “Is this a case of patent infringement where judges are abusing Summary Judgment at the request of the law firm; which showed bias, and prejudice toward a Pro Se litigant?”

2. “Is a Summary Judgment lawful where no discovery, no depositions, no admissions, no plaintiff, no defendants was present, and no due process when a Constitutional Seventh Amendment jury trial was demanded?”

3. “Is it true that two or more persons can have a patent for the same device that goes over the bridge of the Nose; and does it matter who was first patented?”

Posts About this Case

Proceedings and Orders
January 24, 2024
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
February 20, 2024
Petition DENIED.