1. “Is this a case of patent infringement where judges are abusing Summary Judgment at the request of the law firm; which showed bias, and prejudice toward a Pro Se litigant?”
2. “Is a Summary Judgment lawful where no discovery, no depositions, no admissions, no plaintiff, no defendants was present, and no due process when a Constitutional Seventh Amendment jury trial was demanded?”
3. “Is it true that two or more persons can have a patent for the same device that goes over the bridge of the Nose; and does it matter who was first patented?”
