Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
575 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-764
Case
Brumfield v. IBG LLC
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“1. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) empowers parties to seek relief from an adverse judgment, upon a showing of ‘fraud,’ ‘misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.’ Petitioner filed...
Docket No.
24-7455
Case
Williams v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-7447
Case
Aguirre v. Department of Defense
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Who may appeal an adverse action to the Board?” 2. “Is a RULE 60 Motion, Fraud upon the court, sufficient basis for judicial intervention, review and decision on its merits?” 3....
Docket No.
24-726
Case
DISH Network L.L.C. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Patent Act’s fee-shifting statute, 35 U.S.C. § 285, states: ‘The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.’” “The questions presented are:” 1. “Whether the Patent...
Docket No.
24-723
Case
Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit applied an incorrect standard of review for appeals of a Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL) and, as a result, improperly assumed the role...
Docket No.
24-707
Case
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corp.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s Order, overlooking the significant fact that the presiding judge was disqualified due to a conflict of interest—revealed by his late admission of common...
Docket No.
24-698
Case
Kimble-Davis v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Questions Presented are:” 1. “Whether an agency/court can determine an individual is not a designated beneficiary without providing the claimed beneficiary with the appropriate documentation?” 2. “Whether [the Office of Personnel...
Docket No.
24-696
Case
Saha Thai Steel Pipe PCL v. Wheatland Tube Co.
Subject
Trade
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under 19 U.S.C. [§] 1673, Congress directed two agencies, the Department of Commerce (‘Commerce’) and the International Trade Commission (the ‘Commission’ or ‘ITC’), to make two distinct determinations before imposing...
Docket No.
24-6804
Case
White v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Was the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit aware of the discrepancy and deliberately chose not [to] disclose that they would be using a different final order in...
Docket No.
24-6706
Case
Deweese v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-6619
Case
Al Shara v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-6592
Case
Mattison v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Federal Law 28 U.S.C. §1631 requires a transferring court to present non-erroneous or non-arbitrary facts justify[ing] transfer prior to transfer. The Civil Service Reform Act 5 U.S.C. §7703(a) makes clear...
Docket No.
24-635
Case
Celanese International Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011 (‘AIA’), ‘[a] person shall be entitled to a patent unless * * * the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed...
Docket No.
24-6206
Case
Bowden v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Was [the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit] opinion to confirm the Merit System Protection Board (MSPB) decision in the Bowden v. [Office of Personnel Management] case...
Docket No.
24-6127
Case
Doyle v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-5802
Case
Frederick v. McDonough
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “The SHA medical exam is required at discharge by the [Department of Defense and the Department of] Veterans Affairs. When a serviceman is overlooked, would this be a Grave...
Docket No.
24-548
Case
Arbor Global Strategies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The same panel of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that makes the decision to institute inter partes review of a patent’s validity goes on to conduct the inter partes...
Docket No.
24-524
Case
Lighting Defense Group v. SnapRays
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In Calder v. Jones, this Court held that California courts could exercise personal jurisdiction over Florida defendants ‘because of their intentional conduct in Florida calculated to cause injury to [plaintiff]...
Docket No.
24-518
Case
ParkerVision, Inc. v. TCL Industries Holdings Co.
Subject
Rule 3610 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 144 of the Patent Act directs the Federal Circuit to decide appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) by issuing ‘opinion[s].’ 35 U.S.C. § 144. The word...
Docket No.
24-5177
Case
Reed v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Under the Whistleblower Protection Act, does an HR specialist who, after reporting her coworker and first level supervisor for harassment, engage in protected activity, sufficient to merit protection from...