Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
541 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
24-294
Case
Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Congress created the Hatch-Waxman Act with the purpose of hastening the introduction of less-costly generic drugs while safeguarding the legitimate patent rights of innovator companies. The lower court’s interpretation of...
Docket No.
24-292
Case
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. v. Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Subject
Procedure
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“This petition concerns core appellate procedure. In reviewing bench trials, the courts of appeals must ‘discuss’ and ‘analyze’ the district court’s findings, not make factual findings on their own. Icicle...
Docket No.
24-240
Case
W.J. v. Becerra
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“28 U.S.C. § 2501, which is explicitly jurisdictional in that it applies to ‘[e]very claim of which the United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction,’ provides that ‘[a] petition...
Docket No.
24-236
Case
Campbell v. Tube-Mac Industries, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “As Congress has signed the United States of America to the rules and stipulations of the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty and the Federal Circuit through Voda v. Cordis, 476...
Docket No.
24-187
Case
Kency v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 (VEOA), 5 U.S.C. 3330a, Congress established procedures for redress of alleged violations of veterans’ reemployment rights. Preference-eligible veterans contending that their rights have...
Docket No.
24-180
Case
Roku, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 337’s ‘domestic industry’ requirement is the gatekeeper to the International Trade Commission’s unique remedy of an exclusion order. For a patent owner complainant to establish a domestic industry, the...
Docket No.
24-153
Case
Tindall v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the lower courts’ orders allowing Respondent to take, possess and use Petitioner’s property for the public good without paying compensation for that use are manifestly unjust and are...
Docket No.
24-134
Case
Lemon Bay Cove, LLC v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The question presented is whether a regulatory takings claim seeking just compensation under Lucas may be defeated by the mere possibility that a permitting authority might have approved a smaller...
Docket No.
24-114
Case
Zebra Technologies Corporation v. Intellectual Tech LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a party has Article III standing to assert a claim for patent infringement against an accused infringer who has the ability to obtain a license from a third...
Docket No.
24-1058
Case
CloudofChange, LLC v. NCR Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., 572 U.S. 915 (2014), the Court observed that ‘[t]he Federal Circuit’s analysis fundamentally misunderstands what it means to infringe a method patent.’...
Docket No.
23-904
Case
Golden v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-892
Case
Brock v. Department of Transportation
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(2) is fair in allowing 30-days for judicial review in comparison to 60-day rule within 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) and 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(B).” 2. “Whether...
Docket No.
23-804
Case
Liquidia Technologies, Inc. v. United Therapeutics Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (‘AIA’), a party may challenge the validity of a patent in an inter partes review proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (‘PTAB’)...
Docket No.
23-796
Case
Ficep Corporation v. Peddinghaus Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Ficep invented and claimed a method of manufacturing components (like steel beams) of a larger structure (like the skeleton of a building). The claims specifically recite a method of manufacturing...
Docket No.
23-779
Case
Forsythe v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“To ensure that veterans’ claims are presented to agency decisionmakers with all available support, Congress has directed the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to notify each claimant of ‘any information,...
Docket No.
23-768
Case
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 103 of title 35 of the U.S. Code provides that an invention is not patentable if it ‘would have been obvious’ to a person of ordinary skill in the...
Docket No.
23-740
Case
Golden v. Qualcomm, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-739
Case
Schwendimann v. Neenah, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In conducting an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103, did the Federal Circuit err in holding that there ‘is no basis in our case law’ for requiring an articulated...
Docket No.
23-7384
Case
Mandry v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether participation in the Congress-authorized 2017 and 2020 plebiscite for Puerto Ricans, on statehood elections, constitutes an implied in fact contract for the purposes of a Tucker Act claim...
Docket No.
23-7380
Case
Caldwell v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented