Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
633 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
25-1050
Case
Operating Engineers Trust Fund of Washington, D.C. v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“The Affordable Care Act created a transitional ‘reinsurance’ program to subsidize commercial health insurers’ extension of coverage in individual-insurance markets. Congress financed this program in part by requiring group health...
Docket No.
25-1049
Case
Hyatt v. Squires
Subject
Patent4 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Congress has enacted a comprehensive set of legal rules governing the timing of each step in the patent examination process. Yet, invoking the doctrine of ‘prosecution laches,’ the Patent and...
Docket No.
25-1012
Case
HMTX Industries, LLC v. United States
Subject
Trade3 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2411 (the ‘Trade Act’), permits the U.S. Trade Representative (‘USTR’) to take all ‘appropriate and feasible action’ to ‘obtain...
Docket No.
25-1011
Case
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corp. v. Unified Patents, LLC
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“To discourage unnecessary litigation and protect patent owners’ rights, the America Invents Act requires a petition for inter partes review to identify ‘all real parties in interest’ both ‘to the...
Docket No.
25-250
Case
Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc.
Subject
TradeAmicus
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Pub. L. No. 95-223, Tit. II, 91 Stat. 1626, authorizes the tariffs imposed by President Trump pursuant to the national emergencies...
Docket No.
24-889
Case
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Subject
Patent24 AmiciCVSG
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Congress passed the Hatch-Waxman Act ‘[t]o facilitate the approval of generic drugs as soon as patents allow.’  Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405 (2012). ...
Docket No.
24-320
Case
Soto v. United States
Subject
Veterans4 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case determines whether thousands of medically retired combat veterans should receive all the combat related special compensation (CRSC) that Congress specifically authorized for combat veterans. The government has elected...
Docket No.
23-868
Case
Flynn v. Department of State
Subject
MSPB2 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-866
Case
Nordby v. Social Security Administration
Subject
MSPB
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-861
Case
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation
Subject
MSPB10 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case presents a question of critical importance to hundreds of thousands of Americans who serve their country both as federal civilian employees and members of the Armed Services’ reserve...
Docket No.
23-713
Case
Bufkin v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans9 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“For more than a century, veterans have been entitled to the benefit of the doubt on any close issue relating to their eligibility for service-related benefits. As presently codified, ‘[w]hen...
Docket No.
23-21
Case
Harrow v. Department of Defense
Subject
MSPB5 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“When a federal employee petitions the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) provides:...
Docket No.
22-888
Case
Rudisill v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans16 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a veteran who has served two separate and distinct periods of qualifying service under the Montgomery GI Bill, 38 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and under the Post-9/11 GI...
Docket No.
22-704
Case
Vidal v. Elster
Subject
Trademark8 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Section 1052(c) of Title 15 provides in pertinent part that a trademark shall be refused registration if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name . . . identifying a particular...
Docket No.
21-757
Case
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi
Subject
Patent38 AmiciCVSG
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Section 112 of the Patent Act provides that a patent’s ‘specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it,’...
Docket No.
21-432
Case
Arellano v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans7 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Under 38 U.S.C. § 5110(b)(1), ‘[t]he effective date of an award of disability compensation to a veteran shall be the day following the date of the veteran’s discharge or release...
Docket No.
21-350
Case
Infineum USA L.P. v. Chevron Oronite Company LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether this Court should vacate the judgment below in view of its recent decision in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 141 S. Ct. 1970 (2021), and remand so that the...
Docket No.
21-234
Case
George v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans9 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“When the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denies a veteran’s claim for benefits in reliance on an agency interpretation that is later deemed invalid under the plain text of the...
Docket No.
20-853
Case
Iancu v. Fall Line Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who must...
Docket No.
20-440
Case
Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.
Subject
Patent15 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether a defendant in a patent infringement action who assigned the patent, or is in privity with an assignor of the patent, may have a defense of invalidity heard on...