Polaris Innovations Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Co.

 
DOCKET NO.
OP. BELOW
SUBJECT
Patent

Question(s) Presented

1. “Whether severance of the tenure protections for Administrative Patent Judges (‘APJs’) was unavailable to the Arthrex court to remedy the violation of the Appointments Clause by the IPR statute, 35 U.S.C. § 311 et seq, because Congress would have maintained such protection for APJs.” 2. “Whether the Arthrex decision’s removal of APJ tenure protections is insufficient to cure the violation of the Appointments Clause by the IPR statute.”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
July 20, 2020
Consent to the filing of amicus briefs received from counsel for United States submitted.
July 21, 2020
Consent to the filing of amicus briefs received from counsel for Polaris Innovations Limited submitted.