Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
541 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-5325
Case
Adams v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1212 (DC- 3443-22-0385-1-1) which was about Mr. Waschull colluding with his former employer, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)....
Docket No.
23-1118
Case
Ikorongo Texas LLC v. Bumble Trading LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
“Patent Owner and Petitioner obtained reissue patents with new patent claims, which broadened certain limitations and narrowed others vis-à-vis the original patent claims. The district court held the new claims...
Docket No.
21-7205
Case
Holland v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
21-6713
Case
Straw v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-892
Case
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a patent that claims nothing more than a method for separating smaller DNA fragments from larger ones, and analyzing the separated DNA for diagnostic purposes, using well-known laboratory techniques...
Docket No.
20-408
Case
Fredman Bros. Furniture Co. v. Bedgear, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
“Whether administrative patent judges are ‘principal’ or ‘inferior’ Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause.”
Docket No.
20-1339
Case
Sowinski v. California Air Resources Board
Subject
Patent
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Federal Circuit erred in creating and applying a patent-specific preclusion doctrine that bars new issues and new claims that would survive the ‘uniform’ preclusion rules applied by this...
Docket No.
24-997
Case
Doyle v. United States
Subject
TakingsAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under Knick v. Township of Scott, 588 U.S. 180 (2019), a regulatory takings claim is ripe for adjudication in federal court when the government reaches a final decision concerning any...
Docket No.
24-950
Case
Bhagat v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Respondents and the U.S. patent courts are obstructing advancement in nutrition and prevention by unlawfully denying patents, neutering innovation in piecemeal patents, and arbitrarily forcing absurdly narrow patents causing...
Docket No.
24-944
Case
Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“28 U.S.C. § 455 outlines the grounds for disqualification of judges and magistrates due to potential biases or conflicts of interest. This Honorable Court has previously highlighted the fact that:...
Docket No.
24-916
Case
Koss Corporation v. Bose Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In this case, the Federal Circuit precedentially adopted a novel and expansive rule of collateral estoppel (or issue preclusion) that bypasses key requirements this Court has established.” “In [the] first case,...
Docket No.
24-893
Case
Katz v. Department of Justice
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit erred in denying the request for a rehearing en banc, given that Eric Katz suffered through a hostile work environment and was punished for being...
Docket No.
24-866
Case
Converter Manufacturing, LLC v. Tekni-Plex, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The statutory safeguard in Title 35 of the United States Code (the ‘Patent Act’) that prohibits patents on technologies like the teleportation beam from ‘Star Trek’ or the time traveling...
Docket No.
24-836
Case
Impact Engine, Inc. v. Google LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Section 101 of the Patent Act provides that ‘any new and useful process, machine, manufacture or composition of matter’ is eligible for a patent. This Court has added a judicial...
Docket No.
24-827
Case
Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Amzaon.com, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Courts assess whether patent claims are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. §101 using the two-step test articulated in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014).  At Alice Step...
Docket No.
24-764
Case
Brumfield v. IBG LLC
Subject
Patent2 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“1. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) empowers parties to seek relief from an adverse judgment, upon a showing of ‘fraud,’ ‘misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.’ Petitioner filed...
Docket No.
24-726
Case
DISH Network L.L.C. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC
Subject
Patent3 Amici
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Patent Act’s fee-shifting statute, 35 U.S.C. § 285, states: ‘The court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.’” “The questions presented are:” 1. “Whether the Patent...
Docket No.
24-723
Case
Provisur Technologies, Inc. v. Weber, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit applied an incorrect standard of review for appeals of a Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL) and, as a result, improperly assumed the role...
Docket No.
24-707
Case
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corp.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s Order, overlooking the significant fact that the presiding judge was disqualified due to a conflict of interest—revealed by his late admission of common...
Docket No.
24-698
Case
Kimble-Davis v. Office of Personnel Management
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“The Questions Presented are:” 1. “Whether an agency/court can determine an individual is not a designated beneficiary without providing the claimed beneficiary with the appropriate documentation?” 2. “Whether [the Office of Personnel...