FedCircuitBlog

In this article, we highlight two scholarly articles related to the Federal Circuit.

• Eli Lilly v. Teva: Generic Companies Infringe under Akamai IV in Case of Divided Infringement by Christopher M. Holman
• Design Patent Law’s Identity Crisis by Peter S. Menell and Ella Corren

Here are the details.

This morning, the Federal Circuit issued a pair of Rule 36 judgments. Here is a list with links to the orders.

On Friday the Federal Circuit and the Court of Federal Claims issued a joint order extending until October 19, 2020 the limitations on access to the Federal Courts Building set on June 26, 2020. The Federal Circuit also issued a notice with additional information related to the order. Here is the text from the court’s notice.

Here is this month’s update on activity in cases pending before panels of the Federal Circuit where the cases involve at least one amicus brief. We keep track of these patent cases in the “Other Cases” section of our blog. Today, with respect to these cases we highlight two dispositions, three new cases that attracted amicus briefs, two recent oral arguments, and one upcoming oral argument.

As we previously reported, last week in Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC the Federal Circuit granted panel rehearing, issued a modified panel opinion, and denied en banc rehearing. Facebook sought rehearing to challenge the panel’s decisions concerning joinder in inter partes review proceedings, as well as the broader question of whether the Federal Circuit owes deference to interpretations of statutory provisions made by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Precedential Opinions Panel. Here we summarize the modified panel opinion.

This morning, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in a veterans case and a nonprecedential opinion in a patent case. The court also issued three Rule 36 judgments. Here are the introductions to the opinions and a list of the Rule 36 judgments.

• ITC Ruling Offers Chance For Infringer Reprieve From Import Bans – For the first time, the U.S. International Trade Commission has suspended enforcement of a remedial order based on an earlier decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
• Racing Tribunals: The Judge, the Jury, and the PTAB – Later this fall, the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on the petition Personal Audio, LLC v. CBS Corporation. Dennis Crouch explores how this case adds an important third tribunal to the patent story.

Here’s the latest.

Guest Post by Joseph Matal and David McCombs

The Transitional Program for Covered Business Method (“CBM”) Review will come to an end on September 16, 2020, after eight years. In our view, the CBM program’s brief history is a cautionary tale about the costs that are imposed on the system when the Supreme Court delays in rectifying a mistake.

This post summarizes recent activity at the Supreme Court in cases decided by the Federal Circuit.

• The Supreme Court received three new petitions this week in (1) Vilox Technologies, LLC v. Iancu, (2) Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Rovi Guides, Inc., and (3) Drevaleva v. United States.
• One new brief in opposition was filed with the Court by Taser in Phazzer Electronics, Inc. v. Taser International, Inc.
• One new reply brief was filed with the Court by Sanofi-Aventis in Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
• Lastly, one waiver of right to respond to the petition in Customedia Technologies, LLC v. Dish Network Corp. was filed with the Court by Dish Network.

Here are the details.

The Federal Circuit did not issue any new opinions or orders this morning.