1. “Whether the Director’s sanctions rulings, including refusal to terminate the IPR, were arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or otherwise inconsistent with reasoned decisionmaking.” 2. “Whether Intel was improperly joined because its IPR petition was untimely and thus not ‘properly file[d],’ 35 U.S.C. § 315(c).” 3. “Whether the PTAB’s obviousness rulings must be set aside because they rest on an erroneous claim construction and are unsupported by substantial evidence or reasoned decisionmaking.”
