1. “Whether the district court erred by holding that Plaintiffs’ pre-filing assignment of geographically limited patent rights to a newly minted related entity precluded transfer regardless of the convenience of...
“Whether it is unlawful for the federal government to rely on a state’s concededly unconstitutional definition of marriage to deny survivor benefits to the surviving member of a long-term, committed...
“Did the holding in Ortiz v. Principi misinterpret 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.102 by setting forth an equipose-of-the-evidence [sic] standard for veterans to prove their claims...
“Whether the district court clearly abused its discretion by failing to meaningfully exercise its discretion and instead implementing a standard whereby virtually no patent infringement case would be subject to...
“Whether the unusual structure for instituting and funding AIA post-grant reviews violates the Due Process Clause in view of Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), and its progeny, which...
1. “Did the district court err in concluding that it cannot exercise personal jurisdiction over PerDiemCo even though (a) PerDiemCo expressly and repeatedly accused Trimble, a company based in northern...
“Whether, for the purpose of a jurisdictional ruling prior to hearing, the Board erred in failing to consider whether Dr. Tao had engaged in protected activity under 5 U.S.C. §...
Whether “[t]he Veterans Court’s ‘direct relationship’ requirement is an erroneous legal standard for determining what facts are before the Board because it excludes relevant matters that are known or should...
“Whether the district court abused its discretion in declining to apply the first-to- file rule by:
(1) erroneously concluding that the WDTX’s decision regarding the ’606 patent could conflict with the...
“Whether the district court erred in holding that any reasonable juror was required to find that Sanofi-Regeneron established non-enablement by clear-and- convincing evidence.”
“Did the CAVC misinterpret 38 U.S.C. § 7261(a)(2) in holding that a five-year delay in deciding a disabled veteran’s administrative appeal does not amount to an unreasonable delay.”
“Did the CAVC...
“Whether the Board acted contrary to law or arbitrarily and capriciously in denying SIPCO’s motion seeking leave to request a certificate of correction from the Director of the Patent Office,...
“The issues on appeal center on the interplay of the Rule of Two mandate in 38 U.S.C. §§ 8127, 8128 and the printing mandate in 44 U.S.C. § 501 requiring...
“Whether the ASBCA erred in holding that DFARS 252.227-7013 precludes government contractors from marking technical data delivered to the Government in a manner that (a) recognizes the Government’s unlimited rights...
“I. Network-1’s Appeal
A. Independent Basis for Verdict: Does the evidence compel a finding of non-infringement irrespective of the challenged constructions?
B. Claim Construction:
1. Did the district court properly construe ‘low level...
1. “Whether, in determining that Patent No. 6,477,151 (the ‘151’, or the ‘’151 Patent’) is unenforceable, the district court committed an error of law in failing to apply a ‘but...
1. “Did the CAVC misinterpret Rule 23(a)’s commonality requirement to require that a proposed class of disabled veterans seeking class certification of claims alleging unreasonable system-wide delay always identify a...
1. “Whether the asserted claims are invalid because: (1) They were anticipated by the prior art; or (2)They are not enabled and lack sufficient written description.”
2. “Whether the asserted claims...
Whether a “third party’s facility qualif[ies] as a ‘regular and established place of business’ of Google within the Eastern District” based on “Google’s arms-length contract with a third-party service provider...
