1. “Did the district court err in excluding evidence of comparable-license negotiations under the parol-evidence rule in a Georgia-Pacific analysis and the resulting royalty opinions?”
2. “Did the district court err in adopting an evidentiary standard contrary to the Federal Rules to require disclosure of expert and privileged information during fact discovery?”
3. “Did the district court err in resolving factual disputes as a matter of law under Daubert rather than leaving them for the jury?”
4. Did the district court err in requiring further apportionment of the royalty base within a single-component device based on the functionality of the component?