Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City Innovations, LLC

APPEAL NO.
18-1400
OP. BELOW
OPINION
TBD
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
TBD

Issue(s) Presented

1. “Did the Board err in its Final Written Decision in IPR2016-01156 finding that claims 1-15, 17-19 and 22-25 of the ’245 patent were not unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the instituted grounds?”

2. “Did the Board err in its Final Written Decision in IPR2016-01159 finding that claims 203, 209, 215 and 221 of the ’657 patent were not unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the instituted grounds?”

3. “Did the Board err in its Final Written Decision in IPR2016-01158 finding that claims 1, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 18-58 of the ’552 patent were not unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the instituted grounds?”

4. “Did the Board err in its Final Written Decision in IPR2016-01157 finding that claims 14 and 33 of the ’356 patent were not unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the instituted grounds?”

Posts About this Case