Home
Opinions
En Banc
Supreme Court
Other Cases
Administration
All Posts
Opinion Posts
News
SCOTUS Activity
En Banc Activity
Panel Activity
Search
All
Posts
Opinions
En Banc Cases
En Banc Petitions
Supreme Court Cases
Supreme Court Petitions
Other Cases
Search
|
Sitemap
Contact
Sign Up
Home
Opinions
En Banc
Cases
Petitions
Supreme Court
Cases
Petitions
Other Cases
Administration
En Banc Petitions
Search By
Status
Any
Pending
Moot
Granted
Denied
Withdrawn
Subject
Any
Asbestos
Antitrust
Attorney Client Privilege
Attorney Fees
Bankruptcy
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act
Clean Water Act
Contract
Compensation Clause
Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
Copyright
Death Benefit
Disqualification
EAJA
Eminent Domain
Employment
Equal Pay Act
Errata
Fair Labor Standards Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Financial
Foreign Relations Authorization Act
Gov. Contract
Indian Tucker Act
IRS
Jurisdiction
Lanham Act
Little Tucker Act
Military
MSPB
Nuclear Waste
Order
Patent
Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act
Plant Variety Protection Act
Postal
Procedure
Pro Se
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act
Randolph-Sheppard Act
Rule 36
Rule 50
Sanctions
Standing
Takings
Tax
Tucker Act
Trade
Trademark
Trade Secret
Vaccine
Vaccine Act
Veterans
364 Petitions
Appeal No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
19-1994
Case
Stuart v. Rust-Oleum Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Rust-Oleum’s Questions Presented: 1. “Whether this Court erred by vacating and remanding this case based on an Appointments Clause challenge[] raised for the first time in a single pre-briefing motion before...
Appeal No.
19-1956
Case
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. United Patents, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether this Court’s mandamus power is categorically unavailable to police egregious violations of the Board’s duty to apply the real-party-in-interest rules to petitioners whose entire business model is to challenge...
Appeal No.
19-1918
Case
In re PersonalWeb Technologies LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. Whether the court erred in ruling “that the Kessler doctrine precluded claims of infringement arising after this dismissal with prejudice—which involved no finding whatsoever of noninfringement.” 2. Whether “[t]he Panel’s...
Appeal No.
19-1871
Case
Pfizer Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Director Iancu’s Questions Presented: 1. “This case presents the same three questions presented in Arthrex . . . in which all parties have petitioned for en banc review: A. Whether the administrative...
Appeal No.
19-1864, 19-1960
Case
GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“May a Panel of this Court disregard the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s finding that the Petition did not present evidence or arguments that features recited by claims 2-4 and...
Appeal No.
19-1846
Case
Consumer 2.0, Inc. v. Tenant Turner, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Can a court determine at the pleading stage that a claimed method or claim element is unconventional yet not unknown enough to be patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 by...
Appeal No.
19-1838, 19-1839, 19-1840
Case
LiquidPower Specialty Products Inc. v. Baker Hughes
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether objective evidence of nonobviousness may be considered when deciding key obviousness questions such as whether a skilled artisan would have motivation to combine prior art references with a reasonable...
Appeal No.
19-1808 (L), 19-1812, 19-1813, 19-1814
Case
Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Amicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Is it erroneous for a court to resolve a claim construction dispute in the context of a Rule 12 eligibility challenge without claim construction?” 2. “Is it erroneous to place...
Appeal No.
19-1803
Case
Airbus S.A.S. v. Firepass Corp.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. When an Examiner rejects a claim on the basis of obviousness, must that rejection contain within its four corners all of the elements of a prima facie case of...
Appeal No.
19-1794, 19-1223
Case
SAP America, Inc. v. Arunachalam
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Appeal No.
19-1778
Case
Oren Technologies, LLC v. Proppant Express Investments LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether “the Panel decision is contrary to the following precedents of this Court: In re NuVasive, 841 F.3d 966 (Fed. Cir. 2016); Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp.,...
Appeal No.
19-1761
Case
IYM Technologies LLC v. RPX Corporation
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether this Court’s decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019), holding that the appointment of Administrative Patent Judges (‘APJs’) to the...
Appeal No.
19-1756, 19-1934
Case
C R Bard Inc. v. AngioDynamics, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Amicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the panel erred in adopting a bright-line rule that claims reciting printed matter must be directed solely to that printed matter in order to be abstract as a mental...
Appeal No.
19-1746
Case
Ford Global Technologies, LLC v. New World International, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether under the doctrine of repair as applied to design patents the article of manufacture undergoing the repair or reconstruction analysis is determined by a claiming test that demonstrably does...
Appeal No.
19-1745
Case
Diem LLC v. BigCommerce, Inc.
Subject
Attorney Fees
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Whether the Federal Circuit’s “‘prevailing party’ jurisprudence has diverged from most sister circuits in contradiction of Supreme Court law.”
Appeal No.
19-1726
Case
Huang v. Huawei Technologies Co.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the panel decision did not prove the devices accused in case2 are ‘essentially the same’ as the devices accused in case 1 with evidence of detail comparison and...
Appeal No.
19-1708, 19-1709
Case
Twitter, Inc. v. Vidstream LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
If “a skilled artisan would have recognized that a patent’s claimed functionality could have been performed in either of two ways that were shown in the prior art, [are] both...
Appeal No.
19-1671
Case
VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether the Court’s reasoning in Arthrex extends to inter partes reexamination proceedings.”
Appeal No.
19-1669
Case
Lone Star Silicon Innovations v. Iancu
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “[W]hether the Board may issue a final written decision in inter partes review proceedings, which invalidates duly issued patent claims based on a ground not asserted in the corresponding...
Appeal No.
19-1659
Case
ESIP Series 2, LLC v. Puzhen Life USA, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a Notice of Allowability in a child application of a patent in an Inter Partes Review proceeding, facing the same prior art relied upon in the Inter Partes Review,...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19