Sgromo v. Target Brands Inc.

 
APPEAL NO.
21-1702
OP. BELOW
DCT
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
Per Curiam

Question(s) Presented

Whether “the the panel decision is contrary to the following decision(s) of the Supreme Court of the United States or the precedents of this court”: “Mast, Foos Co. v. Stover Mfg. Co., 177 U.S. 485, 488 (1900); “Mobility Workx, LLC v. United States, LLC, 2020-1441, (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2021);” “Enzo APA & Son, Inc. v. Geapag A.G., 134 F.3d 1090, 1092 (Fed. Cir. 1998);” “U.S. v. Solomon, 825 F.2d 1292, 1296 (9th Cir. 1987);” “Gaia Technologies, Inc. v. Reconversion Technologies, Inc., 93 F.3d 774, 780 (Fed. Cir. 1996);” “Rite–Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538, 1552 (Fed.Cir.1995) (en banc);” “SiRF Technology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 601 F.3d 1319, 1327-28 (Fed. Cir. 2010).”

Posts About this Case

Date
Selected Proceedings and Orders