In re Uber Technologies, Inc.

 
APPEAL NO.
21-150
OP. BELOW
DCT
SUBJECT
Patent
AUTHOR
Dyk

Question(s) Presented

  1. “Can a district court transfer a matter to a statutorily proscribed district based on expressly disregarding undisputed facts creating the proscription?”
  2. “What is the applicable standard of review for a petition for a writ of mandamus based on a dispute of law?”
  3. Whether “the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the precedents of this court: Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379 (1953); In re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Hoffman v. Blaski, 363 U.S. 335 (1960); Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612 (1964).”

Posts About this Case

Date
Selected Proceedings and Orders