1. “What distinguishes a claim directed to a specific manner of displaying or navigating information in a computer interface, held patent eligible in Core Wireless, Data Engine, and Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc., from a claim directed to displaying information or improving a user’s experience, held ineligible in Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc., 842 F.3d 1229 (Fed. Cir. 2016); Customedia Techs., LLC v. Dish Network Corp., 951 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2020); IBM v. Zillow Group., Inc., 50 F.4th 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2022); and Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 113 F.4th 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2024)?”
2. “May a technological improvement disclosed in the specification render a user-interface claim non-abstract at Alice step one when the claim does not recite the hardware constraint or performance benefit the specification identifies, as Core Wireless held, and if so, how does that rule operate alongside this Court’s more recent decisions requiring that the improvement be embodied in the claims?”
