Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 15, 2020

This morning, the Federal Circuit issued one precedential opinion in a trade case, one precedential opinion in a patent case, and one nonprecedential opinion in an appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board. Here are the introductions to the opinions.

Read More
Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 14, 2020

This morning, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in a patent case and a nonprecedential opinion denying permission for an interlocutory appeal. The Federal Circuit also issued three Rule 36 judgments. Here are the introductions to the opinions and links to the Rule 36 judgments.

Read More
Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 13, 2020

This morning the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in a patent case and a nonprecedential opinion in a veterans case. Here are the introductions to the opinions.

Read More
Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 12, 2020

The Federal Circuit did not publish any opinions this morning.

Read More
Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 9, 2020

This morning, the Federal Circuit issued one nonprecedential erratum and two nonprecedential Rule 36 judgments. Here is the text of the erratum and links to the Rule 36 judgments.

Read More
Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 8, 2020

This morning the Federal Circuit issued three nonprecedential opinions: two involving appeals from the Merit Systems Protection Board and one in a patent infringement case. Here are the introductions to the opinions.

Read More
Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 7, 2020

This morning, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in a patent case and four nonprecedential opinions in a case appealed from the Merit Systems Protection Board, a case concerning jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, a veterans case, and a patent case. The Federal Circuit also issued two Rule 36 judgments. Here are the introductions to the opinions and links to the Rule 36 judgments.

Read More
Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 6, 2020

This morning the Federal Circuit issued one nonprecedential opinion in a patent case and one Rule 36 judgment. Here is the introduction to the opinion and the link to the Rule 36 judgment.

Read More
Opinions / Panel Activity

Opinion Summary – GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

On Friday, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., a case we have been tracking because it attracted three amicus briefs. Judge Newman authored the majority opinion, which Judge Moore joined. Judges Newman and Moore vacated a district court’s judgment as a matter of law and remanded the case with instructions to reinstate a jury verdict of induced infringement in favor of GlaxoSMithKline based on indications of use in labels applied by Teva, a generic drug manufacturer. Chief Judge Prost filed a thirty-three page dissenting opinion, taking the majority to task for “creating infringement liability for any generic entering the market with a [so-called] skinny label, and by permitting infringement liability for a broader label that itself did not actually cause any direct infringement.” Here is a summary of the majority and dissenting opinions.

Read More
Opinions

Opinions & Orders – October 5, 2020

This morning, the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential opinion in a government contracts case. Here is the introduction of the opinion.

Read More