FedCircuitBlog

This morning the Federal Circuit issued one precedential opinion in a veterans case, one precedential opinion in a government contracts case, and two nonprecedential opinions in patent cases. Here are the introductions to the opinions.

The Federal Circuit did not issue any opinions this morning.

This morning the Federal Circuit issued one precedential opinion in an antidumping case and one nonprecedential order in a patent case. Here is the introduction to the opinion and the text of the order.

Today the Federal Circuit issued two nonprecedential opinions in patent cases. Here are the introductions to the opinions.

This morning the Federal Circuit issued one precedential opinion in a takings case, two nonprecedential opinions in patent cases, one nonprecedential order denying a petition for a writ of mandamus, and one nonprecedential erratum. Here are the introductions to the opinions, the text of the order, and the text of the erratum.

The Federal Circuit did not issue any opinions this morning.

This morning the Federal Circuit issued a precedential order denying en banc rehearing in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., a nonprecedential opinion in a Veterans case, and a Rule 36 judgment. Here is the text of the order and the introductions to the opinions.

This morning the Federal Circuit did not issue any opinions.

This morning the Federal Circuit issued one precedential opinion in a Merit Systems Protection Board case. Here is the introduction to the opinion.

This morning the Federal Circuit issued one precedential opinion in a patent case. Notably, in a concurrence in that case, all three judges on the panel express their view that, were the relevant statute ambiguous, they “would find that no deference is due” to a prior opinion issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Precedential Opinion Panel. Here are the introductions to the majority and concurring opinions.