This morning, the Federal Circuit released two nonprecedential opinions. Both come in patent cases, one appealed from the Northern District of California and one appealed from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Here are the introductions to the opinions.
Receivership Estate of AudienceScience Inc. v. Google LLC (Nonprecedential)
The Receivership Estate of AudienceScience Inc. and Revitalization Partners, LLC appeal the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s grant of Google LLC’s motion for judgment on the pleadings of patent ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and associated determination that amendment would be futile. We affirm.
Zentian Ltd. v. Apple Inc. (Nonprecedential)
Zentian Ltd. (“Zentian”) appeals from a final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in an inter partes review (“IPR”) determining all claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,062,377 (“the ’377 patent”) unpatentable for obviousness. We affirm.