This morning, the Federal Circuit released three nonprecedential opinions and two nonprecedential orders granting motions to withdraw appeals. The first opinion comes in an appeal of a dismissal of a patent infringement case for lack of constitutional standing. The second comes in a pro se appeal of a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans claims. The third comes in an appeal of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board. Here are the introductions to the opinions and links to the orders.
Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc. (Nonprecedential)
Applications in Internet Time, LLC (“AIT”) appeals from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada dismissing its suit for lack of constitutional standing, Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc., No. 3:13-cv-00628-MMD-CLB, 2025 WL 961656 (D. Nev. Mar. 28, 2025) (“Dismissal Decision”), and denying its motion for equitable relief, Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc., No. 3:13-cv-00628-MMD-CLB, 2025 WL 2029841 (D. Nev. July 21, 2025) (“Reconsideration Decision”). For the following reasons, we affirm.
Hooper v. Collins (Nonprecedential)
Seth Hooper appeals pro se from a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”), affirming the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”) denying Mr. Hooper earlier effective dates for his service-connected disability compensation for PTSD, migraines, and a combined disability rating of 100%. Hooper v. Collins, No. 25-0358, 2025 WL 2484992, at *1 (Vet. App. Aug. 29, 2025) (“Decision”). For the reasons below, we affirm-in-part and dismiss-in-part.
Herman v. Department of Justice (Nonprecedential)
Ronald Herman petitions for review of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) denying Mr. Herman’s request for corrective action. For the following reasons, we affirm.