Late yesterday, the Federal Circuit released a nonprecedential order dismissing an appeal. This morning, the Federal Circuit released two nonprecedential opinions and two Rule 36 judgments. One of the opinions comes in an appeal of a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and the other comes in a pro se appeal of a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board. Here are the introductions to the opinions and links to the judgments and dismissal.
Eagle View Technologies, Inc. v. Nearmap US, Inc. (Nonprecedential)
Eagle View Technologies, Inc. (Eagle View) appeals two inter partes review final written decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board), holding that claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 21–22, 24–25, 27, and 29 of U.S. Patent No. 8,670,961 (’961 patent) and claims 1–42 and 46–66 of U.S. Patent No. 8,078,436 (’436 patent) are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. See Nearmap US, Inc. v. Eagle View Techs., Inc., No. IPR2022-01009, 2023 WL 8651434 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 14, 2023) (’961 Decision); Nearmap US, Inc. v. Eagle View Techs., Inc., IPR2022-01090, 2024 WL 100923 (P.T.A.B. Jan. 9, 2024) (’436 Decision). For the following reasons, we affirm.
Nwala v. Department of the Air Force (Nonprecedential)
Chima Akagbue Nwala petitions from a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) denying his request for corrective action. Nwala v. Dep’t of the Air Force, No. AT-3330-24-0398-I-1, 2025 MSPB LEXIS 1940, at *2 (Apr. 8, 2025) (adopting the initial decision, Chima v. Dep’t of the Air Force, No. AT-3330-24-0398-I-1, 2024 MSPB LEXIS 3446 (June 10, 2024), as the Board’s final decision). For the reasons below, we dismiss.