This morning, the Federal Circuit released three nonprecedential opinions and five nonprecedential orders. The first opinion comes in a pro se appeal of a decision of the International Trade Commission in a patent case; the second opinion comes in a pro se appeal of a decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims; and the third opinion comes in a pro se appeal of a decision of the Court of Federal Claims. One of the orders grants a motion to permit an appearance for the purpose of withdrawing an appeal; the other four dismiss appeals. Here are the introductions the opinions and links to the orders.
Sandstrom v. International Trade Commission (Nonprecedential)
Mark Sandstrom appeals the final determination of the U.S. International Trade Commission (“the Commission”), which affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) summary determination of no infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,567,474 (“’474 Patent”) and 10,848,546 (“’546 Patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”) and no violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (“Section 337”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(6). We affirm.
Windsor v. Collins (Nonprecedential)
Pro se appellant Washington Windsor appeals from an order of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We affirm.
Gladden v. United States (Nonprecedential)
Jeremy W. Gladden appeals from decisions of the United States Court of Federal Claims. For the following reasons, we affirm.