This morning the Federal Circuit released two nonprecedential opinions and two nonprecedential orders. Of the nonprecedential opinions, one is a pro se veterans case and the other is a patent case on appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Both nonprecedential orders dismiss cases. Here are the introductions to the opinions and links to the orders.
Onofre v. Hunter (Nonprecedential)
Rolando Onofre appeals a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because we lack jurisdiction over Mr. Onofre’s appeal, we dismiss.
Streck, Inc. v. Ravgen, Inc. (Nonprecedential)
Streck LLC (“Streck”) appeals from a final decision of the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) holding that all challenged claims of U.S. Patent 7,332,277 (“the ’277 patent”) were not shown to have been obvious. Streck, Inc. v. Ravgen, Inc., No. IPR2021-01577, (P.T.A.B. April 18, 2023) (holding that claims 55–61, 68, 69, 80–86, 89–92, 94, 126–130, 132, and 133 had not been shown to be unpatentable) (“Decision”). For the following reasons, we affirm.