This morning, the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential opinion in a patent case appealed from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, a nonprecedential errata, and a Rule 36 judgment. Here is the introduction to the opinion, the text of the errata, and a link to the Rule 36 judgment.

Daikin Industries, Ltd. v. Chemours Company FC, LLC (Nonprecedential)

Daikin Industries, Ltd. (Daikin) appeals a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (Board) in IPR2018-01558 finding claims 1–5 of U.S. Patent No. 9,574,123 (’123 patent) unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

SynQor, Inc. v. Vicor Corp. (Nonprecedential Errata)

Please make the following change:

On page 14, line 23, of the majority opinion, change “n.Error! Bookmark not Defined.” to “n.3”.

Rule 36 Judgment