This morning, the Federal Circuit issued three nonprecedential opinions in a case appealed from the Merit Systems Protection Board, a trade case, and a veterans case. The court also issued a nonprecedential erratum and two Rule 36 judgments. Here are the introductions to the opinions, the text of the erratum, and links to the Rule 36 judgments.

Page v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Nonprecedential)

Petitioner, Jeffery L. Page, a former medical technician for the Department of Veterans Affairs, challenges the Merit System Protection Board’s decision to dismiss his appeal as untimely filed. We affirm.

Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. v. United States (Nonprecedential)

Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. (“Perfectus”) appeals from a decision by the United States Court of International Trade (“Trade Court”) sustaining a final scope ruling issued by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”). See Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. v. United States, 391 F. Supp. 3d 1341 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2019) (“Trade Court Decision”). Commerce held in its final scope ruling that certain aluminum pallets fall within the scope of Commerce’s May 2011 antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Final Scope Ruling on Certain Aluminum Pallets (Dep’t of Commerce June 13, 2017) (“Final Scope Ruling”) (J.A. 19–34). For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

Matwijiszyn v. Wilkie (Nonprecedential)

Stefan Matwijiszyn appeals from the final decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims affirming the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ denial of Mr. Matwijiszyn’s entitlement to service connection for a nervous condition. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Nonprecedential Erratum)

Please make the following change:

On page 6, line 10, change “Mylan” to —Valeant—.

Rule 36 Judgments