This morning the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in a case appealed from the Merit Systems Protection Board, a nonprecedential opinion in a Tucker Act case, and a precedential erratum. Here are the introductions to the opinions and the text of the erratum.

Harris v. Securities and Exchange Commission (Precedential)

Tawana Harris petitions for review of a decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board upholding her performance-based removal by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s factual findings, we affirm.

Taylor v. United States (Nonprecedential)

Janice Sue Taylor appeals from a final decision of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims dismissing her complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Taylor v. United States, No. 19-1353-T, 2020 WL 983245 (Fed. Cl. Jan. 27, 2020). Because we agree that the Claims Court lacked jurisdiction over Taylor’s complaint, we affirm.

Christy, Inc. v. United States (Precedential Erratum)

Please make the following change:

On Page 5, line 10, change “oral argument” to –submission–.