This morning the Federal Circuit issued one nonprecedential opinion in a patent case. Here is the introduction to the opinion.

20/20 Vision Center, LLC v. Vision Precision Holdings, LLC (Nonprecedential)

Appellant 20/20 Vision Center, LLC (“20/20 Vision”) sued Appellees Vision Precision Holdings, LLC, Stanton Optical Florida, LLC, doing business as Stanton Optical & My Eyelab, Thomas Campen MD & Associates, PLLC, and M&D Optical Franchise, LLC (collectively, “Vision Precision”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (“District Court”), alleging, inter alia, infringement of claims 13, 14, 15, and 17 (“the Asserted Claims”) of 20/20 Vision’s U.S. Patent No. 9,230,062 (“the ’062 patent”). Following a claim construction hearing, the District Court entered an order construing all disputed claim terms in Vision Precision’s favor. See 20/20 Vision Ctr., LLC v. Vision Precision Holdings, LLC, No. 9:18-CV-80670-RLR, 2018 WL 5807654, at *10–11 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 6, 2018). As a result, the parties filed a joint motion for entry of final judgment, which the District Court entered as a consent judgment of non-infringement. J.A. 21–25 (Consent Judgment).

20/20 Vision appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1) (2012). We affirm.