This morning the Federal Circuit issued one nonprecedential opinion in a patent case and one Rule 36 judgment. Here is the introduction to the opinion and a link to the Rule 36 judgment.

Lego A/S v. Zuru Inc. (Nonprecedential)

This is an interlocutory appeal of Appellant, ZURU Inc. (“ZURU”), from an order of the District Court for the District of Connecticut granting Appellees LEGO A/S (“LAS”), LEGO Systems, Inc. (“LSI”), and LEGO Juris A/S (“LJAS”) (collectively, “LEGO”) a preliminary injunction directed to ZURU products accused of infringing various LEGO copyrights, trademarks, and design patents. LEGO A/S v. ZURU Inc., No. 3:18-cv-2045(AWT), 2019 WL 4643718 (D. Conn. July 8, 2019). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1292(a), (c) and 1295(a). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm-in-part, vacate-in-part, and remand.

Rule 36 Judgment