Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
511 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
23-6371
Case
Adams v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1695 (DC- 0752-20-0303-1-1) which was about Mr. Waschull’s, Mr. Clover’s, Gen O’Reilly’s, and MDA’s Unlawful Abuse of Power...
Docket No.
23-6370
Case
Adams v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1662 (DC- 3443-21-0137-1-1) which was about Removing the last discriminatory ‘2’ appraisal from my records. And whether Employer...
Docket No.
23-5330
Case
Adams v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1213 (DC- 3443-22-0386-1-1) which was about Mr. Waschull not recuesing himself from the clearance investigation and revocation process...
Docket No.
23-5329
Case
Adams v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1213 (DC- 3443-22-0386-1-1) which was about DIA wrongfully dismissing and ignoring my Discrimination Complaint and Failing to consider...
Docket No.
23-5328
Case
Adams v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1213 (DC- 3443-22-0386-1-1) which was about DIA not recusing themselves from the clearance investigation and revocation process in...
Docket No.
23-5325
Case
Adams v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether CAFC made an error in their decision to dismiss CAFC 2023-1212 (DC- 3443-22-0385-1-1) which was about Mr. Waschull colluding with his former employer, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)....
Docket No.
23-1118
Case
Ikorongo Texas LLC v. Bumble Trading LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
“Patent Owner and Petitioner obtained reissue patents with new patent claims, which broadened certain limitations and narrowed others vis-à-vis the original patent claims. The district court held the new claims...
Docket No.
21-7205
Case
Holland v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
21-6713
Case
Straw v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-892
Case
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Illumina, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a patent that claims nothing more than a method for separating smaller DNA fragments from larger ones, and analyzing the separated DNA for diagnostic purposes, using well-known laboratory techniques...
Docket No.
20-408
Case
Fredman Bros. Furniture Co. v. Bedgear, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
“Whether administrative patent judges are ‘principal’ or ‘inferior’ Officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause.”
Docket No.
20-1339
Case
Sowinski v. California Air Resources Board
Subject
Patent
Status
Dismissed
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Federal Circuit erred in creating and applying a patent-specific preclusion doctrine that bars new issues and new claims that would survive the ‘uniform’ preclusion rules applied by this...
Docket No.
24-5177
Case
Reed v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Under the Whistleblower Protection Act, does an HR specialist who, after reporting her coworker and first level supervisor for harassment, engage in protected activity, sufficient to merit protection from...
Docket No.
24-5152
Case
Herbert v. Allied Rubber & Gasket Co.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Federal Circuit’s affirmance of the district court’s grant of summary judgment without an opinion under Rule 36 is permissible, when the decision conflicts with the Federal Circuit’s...
Docket No.
24-47
Case
Return Mail, Inc. v. United States
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Return Mail has a patent for processing undeliverable mail. This Court is familiar with it, since that patent was at issue in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service,...
Docket No.
24-312
Case
Plotagraph, Inc. v. Lightricks, Ltd.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Inventors Troy Plota, Sascha Connelly and Plotagraph, Inc (Plotagraph) own and practice five patents that disclose applications allowing users to create the illusion of movement within a digital photograph or...
Docket No.
24-294
Case
Norwich Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Congress created the Hatch-Waxman Act with the purpose of hastening the introduction of less-costly generic drugs while safeguarding the legitimate patent rights of innovator companies. The lower court’s interpretation of...
Docket No.
24-240
Case
W.J. v. Becerra
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“28 U.S.C. § 2501, which is explicitly jurisdictional in that it applies to ‘[e]very claim of which the United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction,’ provides that ‘[a] petition...
Docket No.
24-236
Case
Campbell v. Tube-Mac Industries, Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “As Congress has signed the United States of America to the rules and stipulations of the WIPO Patent Cooperation Treaty and the Federal Circuit through Voda v. Cordis, 476...
Docket No.
24-187
Case
Kency v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Under Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 (VEOA), 5 U.S.C. 3330a, Congress established procedures for redress of alleged violations of veterans’ reemployment rights. Preference-eligible veterans contending that their rights have...