Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
663 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
25-7612
Case
Kammunkun v. Department of Defense
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of due process permits an agency official to materially revise investigative findings after the investigative process has concluded, direct adverse action based upon those...
Docket No.
25-7588
Case
Raiszadeh v. Department of Homeland Security
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the Administrative Judge improperly conflated a proposed management ‘Focus Group’ that was repeatedly postponed and ultimately never occurred with separate ‘Draft Focus Group Meeting Notes’ prepared by a...
Docket No.
25-7485
Case
Farley v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether attorney withdrawal that violates modern ethical standards—specifically the duties articulated in ABA Formal Opinion 516—can constitute an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ warranting equitable tolling under Irwin v. Department of Veterans...
Docket No.
25-1412
Case
Tindall v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether Respondent’s multi-year possession, control and use of Petitioner’s property is a taking sufficient to trigger the payment of ‘just compensation’, as required by the 5th Amendment to the...
Docket No.
25-1395
Case
Kabir v. WebMD, LLC
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the systematic denial of Electronic Case Filing (ECF) access to pro se litigants violates the Equal Protection component of the Fifth Amendment by creating a discriminatory two-tiered system...
Docket No.
25-1387
Case
Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals L.P. v. Powder Springs Logistics, LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“The Patent Act provides that if a patent owner proves infringement, courts ‘shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement.’ 35 U.S.C. § 284. Damages are ‘adequate...
Docket No.
25-1372
Case
ASG Solutions Corp. v. United States
Subject
Gov. Contract
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Under the landmark decision Schlesinger v. United States, 390 F.2d 702 (Ct. Cl. 1968), the termination for default (‘T4D’) of a federal contract is void if the contracting officer abdicates...
Docket No.
25-1300
Case
Doe v. Kennedy
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
25-1289
Case
Bolanos-Reynoso v. Department of Agriculture
Subject
MSPB
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“This case presents a question of great importance to the prevention of waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government, and to whether federal civil servants can have confidence that...
Docket No.
25-1230
Case
Google LLC v. VirtaMove, Corp.
Subject
Patent7 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“Congress has long provided that a patent may be held invalid at any point during its term, including when the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) determines that the patent...
Docket No.
25-1170
Case
Winnemucca Indian Colony v. United States
Subject
Indian Tucker Act
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
1. “Is the United States’ promise to provide the Winnemucca Indian Colony, a federally recognized Tribe with lands held in trust established by an Executive Order and a separate legislative...
Docket No.
25-1123
Case
Steele v. Collins
Subject
Veterans2 Amici
Status
Pending
Question(s) Presented
“In the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (‘VA’) intentionally pro-claimant system for adjudicating benefits, a veteran’s period for appealing the denial of a benefits claim only begins to run when the...
Docket No.
25-250
Case
Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc.
Subject
TradeAmicus
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Pub. L. No. 95-223, Tit. II, 91 Stat. 1626, authorizes the tariffs imposed by President Trump pursuant to the national emergencies...
Docket No.
24-889
Case
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Subject
Patent24 AmiciCVSG
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Congress passed the Hatch-Waxman Act ‘[t]o facilitate the approval of generic drugs as soon as patents allow.’  Caraco Pharm. Labs., Ltd. v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405 (2012). ...
Docket No.
24-320
Case
Soto v. United States
Subject
Veterans4 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case determines whether thousands of medically retired combat veterans should receive all the combat related special compensation (CRSC) that Congress specifically authorized for combat veterans. The government has elected...
Docket No.
23-868
Case
Flynn v. Department of State
Subject
MSPB2 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-866
Case
Nordby v. Social Security Administration
Subject
MSPB
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is...
Docket No.
23-861
Case
Feliciano v. Department of Transportation
Subject
MSPB10 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“This case presents a question of critical importance to hundreds of thousands of Americans who serve their country both as federal civilian employees and members of the Armed Services’ reserve...
Docket No.
23-713
Case
Bufkin v. McDonough
Subject
Veterans9 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“For more than a century, veterans have been entitled to the benefit of the doubt on any close issue relating to their eligibility for service-related benefits. As presently codified, ‘[w]hen...
Docket No.
23-21
Case
Harrow v. Department of Defense
Subject
MSPB5 Amici
Status
Granted
Question(s) Presented
“When a federal employee petitions the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to review a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) provides:...