Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Flynn v. Department of State

 
DOCKET NO.
23-868
OP. BELOW
Fed. Cir.
SUBJECT
MSPB

Question(s) Presented

“Whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency.”

Posts About this Case

Date
Proceedings and Orders
January 17, 2024
Application (23A666) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 30, 2024 to February 13, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
January 22, 2024
Application (23A666) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 13, 2024.
February 8, 2024
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2024)
February 22, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 13, 2024 to April 12, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
February 23, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 12, 2024.
February 26, 2024
Brief amicus curiae of Military-Veterans Advocacy, Inc. filed.
February 26, 2024
Brief amicus curiae of Reserve Organization of America filed. VIDED.
April 3, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 12, 2024 to May 10, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
April 4, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 10, 2024.
May 7, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 10, 2024 to May 13, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
May 8, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 13, 2024.
May 13, 2024
Brief of Dept. of State in opposition submitted.
May 24, 2024
Reply of Charles Flynn submitted.
May 28, 2024
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
June 17, 2024
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
May 12, 2025
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
May 19, 2025
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, 605 U. S. ___ (2025).