Search
Search | Sitemap Contact Sign Up

Supreme Court Petitions

Search By
Status
Subject
511 Petitions
Docket No.
Case
Subject
Status
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-803
Case
Langan v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Does the State of Arizona possess the transcendental sovereignty to take away petitioner’s vested rights in private property by a mere legislative act that usurps the power of the judicial...
Docket No.
20-80
Case
Blodgett v. United States
Subject
Takings
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Did the court of appeals err in this FTC Act Sect. 13(b) case in failing to apply Rule 60(b) at the pleading stage, by not analyzing the Motion and...
Docket No.
20-779
Case
Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Did the Federal Circuit categorically and erroneously preclude redress for injured members of joint ventures in the pharmaceutical industry by only recognizing (1) the manufactu[r]ing partner in the joint venture,...
Docket No.
20-773
Case
Khan v. Merit Medical Systems Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether—in line with holdings from the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits—a motion for Rule 11 sanctions may be granted only if the motion is served...
Docket No.
20-769
Case
GS Cleantech Corp. v. Adkins Energy LLC
Subject
PatentAmicus
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the Federal Circuit, in cases arising under the Patent Act, may depart from the uniform rule of the other Circuit Courts that an issue resolved on partial summary judgment,...
Docket No.
20-7407
Case
Alberto Solar-Somohano v. The Coca-Cola Company
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Whether the 2002 Intellectual Property High Technology Technical Amendments Act be repealed-the enrolled bill was missing the section that made the entire act inoperable-that is why 2008 Amendment 35 USC...
Docket No.
20-74
Case
United States v. Image Processing Technologies LLC
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who...
Docket No.
20-737
Case
B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. C&D Zodiac, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“In an inter partes review proceeding under 35 U.S.C. § 311(b), does the Board have authority to consider unpatentability on a ground of obviousness that is not “only on the...
Docket No.
20-728
Case
adidas AG v. Nike, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, Cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who...
Docket No.
20-705
Case
Jaye v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Has the US Court of Federal Claims and US Court of appeals for the Federal Circuit acting in opposition to controlling law (Erickson v. Pardus, Johnson v. City of Shelby)...
Docket No.
20-687
Case
Allen v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-68
Case
Cheetah Omni LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“Did the Federal Circuit violate Rodriguez when it invoked its own federal common law rule, superseding controlling state contract law, to hold that a patent license—one that does not expressly license...
Docket No.
20-679
Case
Micron Technology, Inc. v. North Star Innovations, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “Whether, for purposes of the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2, administrative patent judges of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office are principal officers who...
Docket No.
20-675
Case
Lone Star Silicon Innovations, LLC v. Iancu
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. “[W]hether, in inter partes review proceedings, the Board may issue a final written decision that invalidates duly issued patent claims based on a ground not asserted by the petitioner...
Docket No.
20-656
Case
Kinghorn v. United States
Subject
Procedure
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“What is the correct legal standard of review for determining a Motion to Intervene as of right as well as a Motion to Permissively Intervene when the United States Courts...
Docket No.
20-6470
Case
Wilson v. United States
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-6441
Case
Keel v. Wilkie
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-631
Case
Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc.
Subject
Patent
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
“[W]hether an assignor of a patent may circumvent the doctrine of assignor estoppel by challenging the validity of the assigned patent in administrative proceedings before the Patent Office, and then...
Docket No.
20-624
Case
Golden v. Apple Inc.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
Docket No.
20-623
Case
Amy R. Gurvey v. Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., et al.
Subject
Pro Se
Status
Denied
Question(s) Presented
1. Question #1: In this US patent litigation, whether Petitioner, a Pro Se patentee who is sole named inventor of valuable US ticketing method, apparatus and design patents1, is entitled...