“Section 101 of the Patent Act provides that ‘any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof,’ is eligible for a patent. 35 U.S.C. § 101. The question presented is:”
“Does patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 require ‘specificity,’ ‘unexpected results’ and ‘unconventionality,’ in conflict with the Patent Act and this Court’s decision in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014)?”
