1. “Whether the district court erred in holding the asserted claims ineligible as abstract ideas under 35 U.S.C. §101?”
2. “Whether the district court erred in holding the claimed method and process for automatically routing telephone calls and other communications in a multi-network environment using a physical controller covers ‘abstract ideas’ that are not patent eligible under 35 U.S.C. §101?”
“THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.”
