1. “Whether summary judgment on Teradata’s tying claim should be reversed because the district court erroneously (a) excluded testimony from Teradata’s expert economist; (b) refused to apply the per se...
1. “Whether the special master abused his discretion by denying relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)(1) when a mistake of fact infected the special master’s decision denying compensation.”
2. “Whether the...
1. “Whether the Board erred in finding that Besanceney’s December 2016 disclosure to his supervisors about the lack of probable cause for a search warrant was not protected, when that...
1. “Whether the magistrate judge erred in holding that Mr. Jenkins could not assert a compensable takings claim arising from the federal government’s physical appropriation of his property outside of...
“Whether the CFC’s judgment that the United States is liable for a taking of private property should be reversed on any of the following grounds:
1. The CFC applied an incorrect...
1. “Did the Board err by disregarding the plain meaning of the claims in light of the claim language and specification that require the claimed ‘time select switch . ....
1. “Whether the court erred by applying the Contract Disputes Act’s appellate standard of de novo review.”
2. “Whether the court erred by (a) disregarding as irrelevant or giving little weight...
1. “Can the full MSPB authorize removal of an Administrative Law Judge based in part on that Judge’s explicit adherence to written Agency Policy?”
2. “Can the full MSPB deprive Petitioner...
1. Whether “[t]he Claims Court committed clear error by holding that ‘valid informal claims are only those that [have] not misled the [IRS] and [have been] accepted and treated by...
“Whether the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals erred in holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Lockheed Martin’s appeal from two Air Force modifications that unilaterally definitized contract...
“Whether the Commission legally erred in holding that Panduit and Siemon imported ‘articles that . . . infringe’ under the importation requirement of 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B) based on its...
1. “Where SAS holds multiple copyright registrations affording it a statutory presumption of validity, and where it is well-settled that a defendant contesting the protectability of copied material must present...
1. “Whether the district court clearly erred and/or abused discretion in determining that each of Gorge’s causes of action were not baseless or frivolous.”
2. “Whether the district court clearly erred...
“Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) bars Appellants’ challenge to the NHK-Fintiv Rule, where Appellants’ suit does not seek to appeal any institution decision but instead seeks to set the Rule...
1. “Whether the FDCA’s references to patents that claim a ‘method of using [a]’ drug should be interpreted to encompass those claiming ‘conditions of use,’ as FDA has interpreted that...
“Whether, at Alice step one, Bard’s claims directed to vascular access ports containing, inter alia, structures such as a port body, a septum and an outlet stem and either a...
1. “Were the railroad purpose easements obtained by the railroad as ‘voluntary grants’ broad enough to permit railbanking and the construction of a hiking and biking trail under the Trails...
“The question presented is whether the President acted within his authority when he issued Proclamation 9980, extending the tariffs to derivatives of steel and aluminum, after the 90- and 15-day...
1. “Whether the BCNR erred by failing to give ‘liberal consideration’ to Doyon’s application seeking discharge relief related to his service-connected PTSD, including by failing to give liberal consideration when...
1. “Whether the district court committed legal and clear factual errors and otherwise abused its discretion in holding that Apple met its burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence,...
