“We are bound by our precedent in C R Bard Inc. v. AngioDynamics, Inc., 979 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2020). . . . we conclude that the asserted claims in Bard’s three patents are directed to eligible subject matter under § 101. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s opinion in the lead appeal and find that the asserted claims of the ’302, ’022, and ’615 patents are eligible under § 101. And because the district court applied the same erroneous § 101 analysis to MedComp’s ’324 patent, we vacate and remand the district court’s opinion in the cross appeal and direct the district court to reconsider its findings in the first instance, consistent with this opinion.”
