Appellants
1. “Whether the PTAB legally erred by failing to apply an objective standard for conception, and/or impermissibly awarded priority without identifying any inventive contribution by the purported inventor.”
2. “Whether...
“Whether the United States Court of Federal Claims (CFC) erred when it refused to certify a question of Indiana property law to the Indiana Supreme Court.”
“Whether the CFC erred when...
1. “Whether it is reasonable for Commerce to use a statistical test in a manner inconsistent with the limitations on the methodology described by the methodology’s creator and relevant academic...
1. “Was Commerce’s decision to modify Marmen’s reported product-specific raw material costs arbitrary and unsupported by substantial evidence, given that Commerce failed to apply its longstanding practice and relied on...
1. “Did the Government injure Textron (a requirement for claim accrual) (a) when Textron’s predecessor-in-interest curtailed and terminated the pension plans in December 2012; or (b) when the Government disputed...
1. “Whether the United States effected a physical taking of a California water district’s property right to beneficial use of Santa Clara River water when the government appropriated the Santa...
Appeal:
“Whether the Commission erred in determining that Apple did not violate Section 337 on the basis that claims 16 and 17 of the ’499 patent are invalid for lack of...
1. “Whether the Board erred in determining that claims 7-9 and 17-19 of the ’499 patent and claims 3, 5, 6, 19, 21, and 22 of the ’731 patent, which...
1. “Whether the Board applied an incorrect claim construction to the product-by-process claims, where the Board implicitly construed the claims as requiring several additional process steps not recited in the...
1. “Whether the Claims Court erred in dismissing the Complaint which contained well plead facts sufficient to support HDCC’s claims?”
2. “Whether the Claims Court erred in dismissing portion of HDCC’s...
1. “Did the International Trade Commission (‘Commission’) err when it found that claims 1, 2, 11, 15, and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 10,508,502 (‘the ‘502 patent’) are directed to...
1. “Did the Board err in applying the legislatively overruled Huffman holding denying full 5 U.S.C. Section 1221(e) contributing factor/clear and convincing evidence regime protections to disclosures made pursuant to...
1. “Whether the Board erred in finding that for the limitation ‘an LED circuit array comprising an LED circuit comprising a plurality of LEDs connected in series’ is properly construed...
1. “Whether the statutory requirement to list in the Orange Book any patent that ‘claims the drug for which the applicant submitted [an NDA] and is a drug product (formulation...
1. “Article 3(n) of the Friant Contracts prohibits the United States from delivering San Joaquin River water to the Exchange Contractors unless and until ‘required’ to do so by the...
“The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) currently pays the ‘actual cost’ of ground and air ambulance transports for eligible veterans and beneficiaries pursuant to its regulation at 38 C.F.R....
1. “Whether the district court’s order denying an antisuit injunction should be reversed because the court erred as a matter of law in finding, as a threshold matter, that resolving...
“Whether the district court—which found that ‘Crocs admits that its advertisements have “linked” such terms as “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” to features, characteristics, and qualities of the product material, and...
1. “The CFC improperly denied ACLR’s Motion for Summary Judgment on its breach of contract claim as to ACLR’s plan year 2007 duplicate payment audit.”
2. “The CFC’s application of a...
