“Whether the Commission legally erred in holding that Panduit and Siemon imported ‘articles that . . . infringe’ under the importation requirement of 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(B) based on its...
1. “Where SAS holds multiple copyright registrations affording it a statutory presumption of validity, and where it is well-settled that a defendant contesting the protectability of copied material must present...
1. “Whether the district court clearly erred and/or abused discretion in determining that each of Gorge’s causes of action were not baseless or frivolous.”
2. “Whether the district court clearly erred...
“Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) bars Appellants’ challenge to the NHK-Fintiv Rule, where Appellants’ suit does not seek to appeal any institution decision but instead seeks to set the Rule...
1. “Whether the FDCA’s references to patents that claim a ‘method of using [a]’ drug should be interpreted to encompass those claiming ‘conditions of use,’ as FDA has interpreted that...
“Whether, at Alice step one, Bard’s claims directed to vascular access ports containing, inter alia, structures such as a port body, a septum and an outlet stem and either a...
1. “Were the railroad purpose easements obtained by the railroad as ‘voluntary grants’ broad enough to permit railbanking and the construction of a hiking and biking trail under the Trails...
“The question presented is whether the President acted within his authority when he issued Proclamation 9980, extending the tariffs to derivatives of steel and aluminum, after the 90- and 15-day...
1. “Whether the BCNR erred by failing to give ‘liberal consideration’ to Doyon’s application seeking discharge relief related to his service-connected PTSD, including by failing to give liberal consideration when...
1. “Whether the district court committed legal and clear factual errors and otherwise abused its discretion in holding that Apple met its burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence,...
1. “Whether the district court lacks Article III jurisdiction to enforce its Hearing Order investigating Petitioner’s compliance with standing orders when the cases have been dismissed and there is no...
1. “Whether the district court lacks Article III jurisdiction to enforce its Hearing Order investigating Petitioner’s compliance with standing orders when the cases have been dismissed and there is no...
1. “Lobbying Costs. Absent narrow exceptions, Federal contractors are not allowed to charge the Government for lobbying activities. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 31.205-22 (reproduced at Addendum C). Raytheon includes a...
“Petitioner respectfully requests that the Court issue a writ of mandamus reversing the Memorandum Order, and directing the district court to terminate its judicial inquisition of the Petitioner.”
1. “Whether Uniloc, the undisputed owner of the patent-in-suit at the time the complaint was filed, had standing under Article III of the Constitution to sue for infringement of the...
Appeal:
1. “Does the issuance of a NITU by the STB trigger a per se categorical physical taking under the Trails Act, rendering any ‘causation’ standard inappropriate?”
2. “Does the duration of...
Appeal:
“Whether the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) erred in holding that it could certify a class that includes veterans over whom it lacks jurisdiction.”
Cross-Appeal:
1. “Whether...
1. “Whether the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records may exercise its powers under [10 U.S.C.] § 1552 to grant Mr. LaBonte disability retirement and amend his DD-214...
“The issue presented in this case is whether an AI-Generated Invention is patentable. The USPTO claims that it is not, filing a summary judgment motion to that effect, which was...
1. “Did the district court err in finding that Thales did not demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of its counterclaim requesting that the district court declare...
