1. “Whether the U.S. PTO erred in construing the claim limitations relating to ‘user input login information including an identification code associated with the user from the non-browser based application’ and ‘information authenticating the user associated with the user input login information.’”
2. “Whether the U.S. PTO erred in construing the claim limitation ‘identification code associated with the user’ to be the same as the claim limitation ‘personal identification number (PIN).’”
3. “Whether the U.S. PTO erred in construing the claim limitations relating to the ‘identification of one or more products selected from the list of products’ and the ‘transaction purchase request.’”
4. “Whether the U.S. PTO erred in construing the claim limitations relating to the ‘remote management server’ and the ‘transaction server.’”
5. “Whether the PTAB erred in ruling that independent claims 1 and 13 of the ’259 patent would have been obvious over Khedouri, Goldthwaite, Coward, Dua and Harrison.”
6. “Whether the PTAB erred in ruling that independent claim 7 of the ’259 patent would have been obvious over Khedouri, Goldthwaite, Coward, and Harrison.”
7. “Whether the PTAB erred in ruling that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Khedouri’s network and Goldthwaite’s financial institution server when such a combination would render Khedouri’s network unsuitable for its intended purpose.”
